1987AAPG BulletinRequires access

Siliciclastic control on carbonate platform evolution

Franz O. Meyer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) to Early Cretaceous (Valanginian) carbonate platforms in the western Atlantic exhibit both progradational and aggradational growth modes. Their development is reflected in seismic shelf edge and depositional facies geometries. These geometric relationships, together with paleotologic and diagenetic data, permit interpretation of the primary controlling factors on platform evolution. Atlantic platform growth and development during the Late Jurassic relative to rise in sea level vary directly with the siliciclastics. Carbonate platforms receiving siliciclastics prograde; those which do not, aggrade. This variation in platform evolution is found in equivalent-age platforms from other western Atlantic basins and as successive platform growth stages within the Baltimore Canyon basin. The switch from progradation to aggradation follows the termination of siliciclastics influx during flooding of an exposed platform. Platform height is maintained or decreases in the prograded stage but increases in the aggraded stage of platform growth associated with rising sea level. Aggraded platform growth demands progressively larger volumes of carbonate sediment as platform height increases. Progradation is thus limited by an increase in carbonates required for vertical platform growth. Siliciclastic filling of basins adjoining carbonate platforms has several important implications. First, siliciclastics may bypass active carbonate margins. Second, their volumetric contribution tomore » basin fill can be sufficiently large to allow progradation of platforms that are otherwise limited to aggradational growth by their sedimentary carbonate budget.« less

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) to Early Cretaceous (Valanginian) carbonate platforms in the western Atlantic exhibit both progradational and aggradational growth modes. Their development is reflected in seismic shelf edge and depositional facies geometries. These geometric relationships, together with paleotologic and diagenetic data, permit interpretation of the primary controlling factors on platform evolution. Atlantic platform growth and development during the Late Jurassic relative to rise in sea level vary directly with the siliciclastics. Carbonate platforms receiving siliciclastics prograde; those which do not, aggrade. This variation in platform evolution is found in equivalent-age platforms from other western Atlantic basins and as successive platform growth stages within the Baltimore Canyon basin. The switch from progradation to aggradation follows the termination of siliciclastics influx during flooding of an exposed platform. Platform height is maintained or decreases in the prograded stage but increases in the aggraded stage of platform growth associated with rising sea level. Aggraded platform growth demands progressively larger volumes of carbonate sediment as platform height increases. Progradation is thus limited by an increase in carbonates required for vertical platform growth. Siliciclastic filling of basins adjoining carbonate platforms has several important implications. First, siliciclastics may bypass active carbonate margins. Second, their volumetric contribution tomore » basin fill can be sufficiently large to allow progradation of platforms that are otherwise limited to aggradational growth by their sedimentary carbonate budget.« less

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) to Early Cretaceous (Valanginian) carbonate platforms in the western Atlantic exhibit both progradational and aggradational growth modes. Their development is reflected in seismic shelf edge and depositional facies geometries. These geometric relationships, together with paleotologic and diagenetic data, permit interpretation of the primary controlling factors on platform evolution. Atlantic platform growth and development during the Late Jurassic relative to rise in sea level vary directly with the siliciclastics. Carbonate platforms receiving siliciclastics prograde; those which do not, aggrade. This variation in platform evolution is found in equivalent-age platforms from other western Atlantic basins and as successive platform growth stages within the Baltimore Canyon basin. The switch from progradation to aggradation follows the termination of siliciclastics influx during flooding of an exposed platform. Platform height is maintained or decreases in the prograded stage but increases in the aggraded stage of platform growth associated with rising sea level. Aggraded platform growth demands progressively larger volumes of carbonate sediment as platform height increases. Progradation is thus limited by an increase in carbonates required for vertical platform growth. Siliciclastic filling of basins adjoining carbonate platforms has several important implications. First, siliciclastics may bypass active carbonate margins. Second, their volumetric contribution tomore » basin fill can be sufficiently large to allow progradation of platforms that are otherwise limited to aggradational growth by their sedimentary carbonate budget.« less

Key concepts: Aggradation, Progradation, Geology, Siliciclastic, Carbonate platform, Paleontology, Sedimentary depositional environment, Carbonate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Siliciclastic control on carbonate platform evolution — Research Paper | ScholarLens