1994Unpublished venueRequires access

Safety impacts of different speed limits on cars and trucks

D L Harkey, R Mera

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine whether differential or uniform speed limits are more beneficial to transportation safety and traffic operations on interstate highways. The approach to achieving this objective was to examine speed and accident data from states employing both types of limits. Speed data were collected in 12 states at rural and urban locations representing all speed limits currently established on the interstate highway system for cars/trucks, ie 55/55 mi/h (89/89 km/h), 65/55 mi/h (105/89 km/h), 65/60 mi/h (105/97 km/h), and 65/65 mi/h (105/105 km/h). Accident data were obtained from nine states which were geographically distributed across the country and representative of all rural interstate speed limits currently established. For the speed data collected, a number of measures of effectiveness (MOEs) were examined including mean speed, speed variance, compliance, and speed distribution measures. For the accident data collected, types of crashes were examined (eg rear-end) along with vehicle involvement (eg car-into-truck) and crash severity. This final report summarizes the effects of uniform and differential speed limits on transportation safety and traffic operations as determined by the examination of speed and accident data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objectives of this study were to determine whether differential or uniform speed limits are more beneficial to transportation safety and traffic operations on interstate highways. The approach to achieving this objective was to examine speed and accident data from states employing both types of limits. Speed data were collected in 12 states at rural and urban locations representing all speed limits currently established on the interstate highway system for cars/trucks, ie 55/55 mi/h (89/89 km/h), 65/55 mi/h (105/89 km/h), 65/60 mi/h (105/97 km/h), and 65/65 mi/h (105/105 km/h). Accident data were obtained from nine states which were geographically distributed across the country and representative of all rural interstate speed limits currently established. For the speed data collected, a number of measures of effectiveness (MOEs) were examined including mean speed, speed variance, compliance, and speed distribution measures. For the accident data collected, types of crashes were examined (eg rear-end) along with vehicle involvement (eg car-into-truck) and crash severity. This final report summarizes the effects of uniform and differential speed limits on transportation safety and traffic operations as determined by the examination of speed and accident data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine whether differential or uniform speed limits are more beneficial to transportation safety and traffic operations on interstate highways. The approach to achieving this objective was to examine speed and accident data from states employing both types of limits. Speed data were collected in 12 states at rural and urban locations representing all speed limits currently established on the interstate highway system for cars/trucks, ie 55/55 mi/h (89/89 km/h), 65/55 mi/h (105/89 km/h), 65/60 mi/h (105/97 km/h), and 65/65 mi/h (105/105 km/h). Accident data were obtained from nine states which were geographically distributed across the country and representative of all rural interstate speed limits currently established. For the speed data collected, a number of measures of effectiveness (MOEs) were examined including mean speed, speed variance, compliance, and speed distribution measures. For the accident data collected, types of crashes were examined (eg rear-end) along with vehicle involvement (eg car-into-truck) and crash severity. This final report summarizes the effects of uniform and differential speed limits on transportation safety and traffic operations as determined by the examination of speed and accident data.

Key concepts: Speed limit, Truck, Transport engineering, Crash, Differential (mechanical device), Environmental science, Engineering, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Safety impacts of different speed limits on cars and trucks — Research Paper | ScholarLens