2012Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Global Economic Institutions

Marc Williams

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction This chapter explores the role of three global economic institutions (GEIs) in contemporary economic governance: the International Monetary Fund (IMF) , the World Bank and the World Trade Organization (WTO) . As we will see there is no single vantage point from which to view these institutions or from which to assess their importance. In the first part of the chapter we discuss global governance and globalisation and examine competing perspectives on international organisations. Controversies over the role of the GEIs in the global economy have focused on the economic impact of their activities and their representative nature as institutions of governance. The second part therefore explores the historical evolution of the IMF, World Bank and WTO as they adapted to the challenges of an evolving global economy. In this section we will examine competing claims concerning their competence as economic managers. Recently, the legitimacy, accountability and representative nature of GEIs have been called into question. The final part of the chapter focuses on the debate over the democratic credentials of the GEIs. In 2008 a financial crisis with its origins in the US spread to the rest of the world ushering in a global financial crisis with deep and profound consequences for most countries in the world. The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008–09 was the most severe experienced by credit markets since the Great Depression of the 1930s (Collyns 2008). The financial crisis in turn sparked an economic recession as economic output fell. It was apparent from the outset that individual nations could not return to economic prosperity through reliance on their own economic measures. In other words, both national and international action was necessary to repair the damage wrought by the GFC. Under these circumstances forms of global regulation and management came under intense scrutiny and the focus turned to the key institutions of global economic management with many commentators debating the relevance of the Bretton Woods institutions (the IMF and World Bank) to the twenty-first century economic landscape (Boughton 2009; Pisani-Ferry and Santos 2009). One major innovation in the area of global governance was the rise of the Group of 20 ( G20 ), and while the implications of the shift from the G8 to the G20 certainly marks an important evolution in the institutionalisation of global economic governance (Beeson and Bell 2009; Helleiner and Pagliari 2009), the global economic crisis served to highlight the continuing relevance of the Bretton Woods institutions and the WTO to contemporary global governance. This chapter focuses on the World Bank, IMF and WTO – arguably, the most important GEIs in contemporary world politics. In order to understand the activities of these institutions and the controversies surrounding them it is necessary to look at both their historical evolution and the various ways in which writers analyse international organisations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction This chapter explores the role of three global economic institutions (GEIs) in contemporary economic governance: the International Monetary Fund (IMF) , the World Bank and the World Trade Organization (WTO) . As we will see there is no single vantage point from which to view these institutions or from which to assess their importance. In the first part of the chapter we discuss global governance and globalisation and examine competing perspectives on international organisations. Controversies over the role of the GEIs in the global economy have focused on the economic impact of their activities and their representative nature as institutions of governance. The second part therefore explores the historical evolution of the IMF, World Bank and WTO as they adapted to the challenges of an evolving global economy. In this section we will examine competing claims concerning their competence as economic managers. Recently, the legitimacy, accountability and representative nature of GEIs have been called into question. The final part of the chapter focuses on the debate over the democratic credentials of the GEIs. In 2008 a financial crisis with its origins in the US spread to the rest of the world ushering in a global financial crisis with deep and profound consequences for most countries in the world. The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008–09 was the most severe experienced by credit markets since the Great Depression of the 1930s (Collyns 2008). The financial crisis in turn sparked an economic recession as economic output fell. It was apparent from the outset that individual nations could not return to economic prosperity through reliance on their own economic measures. In other words, both national and international action was necessary to repair the damage wrought by the GFC. Under these circumstances forms of global regulation and management came under intense scrutiny and the focus turned to the key institutions of global economic management with many commentators debating the relevance of the Bretton Woods institutions (the IMF and World Bank) to the twenty-first century economic landscape (Boughton 2009; Pisani-Ferry and Santos 2009). One major innovation in the area of global governance was the rise of the Group of 20 ( G20 ), and while the implications of the shift from the G8 to the G20 certainly marks an important evolution in the institutionalisation of global economic governance (Beeson and Bell 2009; Helleiner and Pagliari 2009), the global economic crisis served to highlight the continuing relevance of the Bretton Woods institutions and the WTO to contemporary global governance. This chapter focuses on the World Bank, IMF and WTO – arguably, the most important GEIs in contemporary world politics. In order to understand the activities of these institutions and the controversies surrounding them it is necessary to look at both their historical evolution and the various ways in which writers analyse international organisations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction This chapter explores the role of three global economic institutions (GEIs) in contemporary economic governance: the International Monetary Fund (IMF) , the World Bank and the World Trade Organization (WTO) . As we will see there is no single vantage point from which to view these institutions or from which to assess their importance. In the first part of the chapter we discuss global governance and globalisation and examine competing perspectives on international organisations. Controversies over the role of the GEIs in the global economy have focused on the economic impact of their activities and their representative nature as institutions of governance. The second part therefore explores the historical evolution of the IMF, World Bank and WTO as they adapted to the challenges of an evolving global economy. In this section we will examine competing claims concerning their competence as economic managers. Recently, the legitimacy, accountability and representative nature of GEIs have been called into question. The final part of the chapter focuses on the debate over the democratic credentials of the GEIs. In 2008 a financial crisis with its origins in the US spread to the rest of the world ushering in a global financial crisis with deep and profound consequences for most countries in the world. The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008–09 was the most severe experienced by credit markets since the Great Depression of the 1930s (Collyns 2008). The financial crisis in turn sparked an economic recession as economic output fell. It was apparent from the outset that individual nations could not return to economic prosperity through reliance on their own economic measures. In other words, both national and international action was necessary to repair the damage wrought by the GFC. Under these circumstances forms of global regulation and management came under intense scrutiny and the focus turned to the key institutions of global economic management with many commentators debating the relevance of the Bretton Woods institutions (the IMF and World Bank) to the twenty-first century economic landscape (Boughton 2009; Pisani-Ferry and Santos 2009). One major innovation in the area of global governance was the rise of the Group of 20 ( G20 ), and while the implications of the shift from the G8 to the G20 certainly marks an important evolution in the institutionalisation of global economic governance (Beeson and Bell 2009; Helleiner and Pagliari 2009), the global economic crisis served to highlight the continuing relevance of the Bretton Woods institutions and the WTO to contemporary global governance. This chapter focuses on the World Bank, IMF and WTO – arguably, the most important GEIs in contemporary world politics. In order to understand the activities of these institutions and the controversies surrounding them it is necessary to look at both their historical evolution and the various ways in which writers analyse international organisations.

Key concepts: Globalization, Accountability, Global governance, Political science, Corporate governance, Economic governance, Legitimacy, World economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Global Economic Institutions — Research Paper | ScholarLens