2008University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)Open access

Economic and environmental analysis of fodder harvesting practices associated with mulga (Acacia aneura) and fire management practices in the mulga lands of south western Queensland

Manda Page, Bradd Witt, Michelle V. Noël, Geoff Slaughter, R. J. S. Beeton

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The project was funded by the Australian Government, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, and was bounded within the 18.1 million hectares of \nQueensland's mulga lands. The time frame of the project was 18 months. Consequently, long term real-time approaches to data collection were not possible. A natural experiment model was adopted investigating a representative range of recent and historical practices using 'time since action' as a temporal surrogate. \n \nAn initial stage of the project identified and detailed the current and historical range and extent of management practices associated with mulga fodder harvesting in the region. Local landholders were recruited and participated in group interviews to draw on experiential local knowledge. Outcomes of group interviews were used to develop a clear understanding of fodder harvesting practices in the region and classify the range of practices into a manageable number of scenarios for further site specific investigation. \n \nThe financial costs and returns associated with different methods of fodder harvesting were modelled and compared to alternative management strategies that landholders may employ if fodder harvesting was not an option. \n \nThe strategies compared were harvesting, agistment of stock elsewhere, and selling (and re-purchasing) stock. The \neconomic modelling was based on six case properties that were derived from survey data provided by landholders.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The project was funded by the Australian Government, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, and was bounded within the 18.1 million hectares of \nQueensland's mulga lands. The time frame of the project was 18 months. Consequently, long term real-time approaches to data collection were not possible. A natural experiment model was adopted investigating a representative range of recent and historical practices using 'time since action' as a temporal surrogate. \n \nAn initial stage of the project identified and detailed the current and historical range and extent of management practices associated with mulga fodder harvesting in the region. Local landholders were recruited and participated in group interviews to draw on experiential local knowledge. Outcomes of group interviews were used to develop a clear understanding of fodder harvesting practices in the region and classify the range of practices into a manageable number of scenarios for further site specific investigation. \n \nThe financial costs and returns associated with different methods of fodder harvesting were modelled and compared to alternative management strategies that landholders may employ if fodder harvesting was not an option. \n \nThe strategies compared were harvesting, agistment of stock elsewhere, and selling (and re-purchasing) stock. The \neconomic modelling was based on six case properties that were derived from survey data provided by landholders.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The project was funded by the Australian Government, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, and was bounded within the 18.1 million hectares of \nQueensland's mulga lands. The time frame of the project was 18 months. Consequently, long term real-time approaches to data collection were not possible. A natural experiment model was adopted investigating a representative range of recent and historical practices using 'time since action' as a temporal surrogate. \n \nAn initial stage of the project identified and detailed the current and historical range and extent of management practices associated with mulga fodder harvesting in the region. Local landholders were recruited and participated in group interviews to draw on experiential local knowledge. Outcomes of group interviews were used to develop a clear understanding of fodder harvesting practices in the region and classify the range of practices into a manageable number of scenarios for further site specific investigation. \n \nThe financial costs and returns associated with different methods of fodder harvesting were modelled and compared to alternative management strategies that landholders may employ if fodder harvesting was not an option. \n \nThe strategies compared were harvesting, agistment of stock elsewhere, and selling (and re-purchasing) stock. The \neconomic modelling was based on six case properties that were derived from survey data provided by landholders.

Key concepts: Fodder, Agroforestry, Grazing, Vegetation (pathology), Geography, Plant ecology, Acacia, Rangeland

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Economic and environmental analysis of fodder harvesting practices associated with mulga (Acacia aneura) and fire management practices in the mulga lands of south western Queensland — Research Paper | ScholarLens