1998Unpublished venueRequires access

Strategic issues and options for the quadrennial defense review

Paul K Davis, Richard L. Kugler, Richard Hillestad

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Abstract : As the Department of Defense conducts its first Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), it will wish to examine a range of strategic options. The purpose in doing so is not so much to identify clear-cut alternatives, and then to choose one in pure form, but rather to consider some dramatized issues and choices as part of preparing for the synthesis of actual Department of Defense (DoD) strategy. This briefing is our attempt to assist in that process. As described elsewhere, we recommend a management approach to defense planning. In this framework, DoD's investments are seen as contributing to a portfolio of activities (Figure S.1), the elements of which are (1) maintaining and improving capabilities for diverse military contingencies, both large and small; (2) shaping the international environment in the three principal regions of concern (Europe, the Greater Middle East and East Asia); and (3) assuring strategic adaptiveness so that the United States can in the future change the size, character, geographical focus, and posture of its forces readily in response to whatever technical or geopolitical challenges emerge.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : As the Department of Defense conducts its first Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), it will wish to examine a range of strategic options. The purpose in doing so is not so much to identify clear-cut alternatives, and then to choose one in pure form, but rather to consider some dramatized issues and choices as part of preparing for the synthesis of actual Department of Defense (DoD) strategy. This briefing is our attempt to assist in that process. As described elsewhere, we recommend a management approach to defense planning. In this framework, DoD's investments are seen as contributing to a portfolio of activities (Figure S.1), the elements of which are (1) maintaining and improving capabilities for diverse military contingencies, both large and small; (2) shaping the international environment in the three principal regions of concern (Europe, the Greater Middle East and East Asia); and (3) assuring strategic adaptiveness so that the United States can in the future change the size, character, geographical focus, and posture of its forces readily in response to whatever technical or geopolitical challenges emerge.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : As the Department of Defense conducts its first Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), it will wish to examine a range of strategic options. The purpose in doing so is not so much to identify clear-cut alternatives, and then to choose one in pure form, but rather to consider some dramatized issues and choices as part of preparing for the synthesis of actual Department of Defense (DoD) strategy. This briefing is our attempt to assist in that process. As described elsewhere, we recommend a management approach to defense planning. In this framework, DoD's investments are seen as contributing to a portfolio of activities (Figure S.1), the elements of which are (1) maintaining and improving capabilities for diverse military contingencies, both large and small; (2) shaping the international environment in the three principal regions of concern (Europe, the Greater Middle East and East Asia); and (3) assuring strategic adaptiveness so that the United States can in the future change the size, character, geographical focus, and posture of its forces readily in response to whatever technical or geopolitical challenges emerge.

Key concepts: Principal (computer security), Geopolitics, Portfolio, Strategic planning, Process (computing), Military strategy, Political science, Public relations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Strategic issues and options for the quadrennial defense review — Research Paper | ScholarLens