1968The Journal of ImmunologyRequires access

Heterogeneity in the Properties of 7 S and 19 S Rabbit-Neutralizing Antibodies to Herpes Simplex Virus

Berge Hampar, Abner Louis Notkins, Michael G. Mage, Mary Alice Keehn

Open publisher page 101 citations

Abstract

Summary The 7 S and 19 S rabbit antibodies to herpes simplex virus (HSV) from early and late (hyperimmune) sera differed in their ability to sensitize virus for subsequent neutralization by either complement (C′) or anti-γ-globulin (GAR). The early 7 S and 19 S antibodies showed low to negligible neutralizing activity in the absence of C′ or GAR. When C′ was added, however, both of these antibodies showed enhanced neutralizing activity. The early 7 S but not the early 19 S antibody was also capable of sensitizing virus for subsequent neutralization by GAR. The late 19 S antibody could neutralize virus in the absence of C′ or GAR, but its activity was enhanced in the presence of C′ or GAR. The late 7 S antibody showed high neutralizing activity in the absence of C′ or GAR. In the presence of C′, the neutralization rate constants (K) but not the neutralization titers of the late 7 S antibody were enhanced. In contrast, the neutralization titers of the late 7 S antibody were enhanced approximately threefold with GAR. The neutralizing activity of the early and late 19 S antibodies with C′ or GAR was sensitive to inactivation by 2-ME. Similarly, the neutralizing activity with C′ of the early 7 S antibody and the enhanced rate of neutralization with C′ of the late 7 S antibody were sensitive to inactivation by 2-ME. In contrast, 2-ME did not reduce the neutralization titers of the early and late 7 S antibodies in the presence of GAR.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary The 7 S and 19 S rabbit antibodies to herpes simplex virus (HSV) from early and late (hyperimmune) sera differed in their ability to sensitize virus for subsequent neutralization by either complement (C′) or anti-γ-globulin (GAR). The early 7 S and 19 S antibodies showed low to negligible neutralizing activity in the absence of C′ or GAR. When C′ was added, however, both of these antibodies showed enhanced neutralizing activity. The early 7 S but not the early 19 S antibody was also capable of sensitizing virus for subsequent neutralization by GAR. The late 19 S antibody could neutralize virus in the absence of C′ or GAR, but its activity was enhanced in the presence of C′ or GAR. The late 7 S antibody showed high neutralizing activity in the absence of C′ or GAR. In the presence of C′, the neutralization rate constants (K) but not the neutralization titers of the late 7 S antibody were enhanced. In contrast, the neutralization titers of the late 7 S antibody were enhanced approximately threefold with GAR. The neutralizing activity of the early and late 19 S antibodies with C′ or GAR was sensitive to inactivation by 2-ME. Similarly, the neutralizing activity with C′ of the early 7 S antibody and the enhanced rate of neutralization with C′ of the late 7 S antibody were sensitive to inactivation by 2-ME. In contrast, 2-ME did not reduce the neutralization titers of the early and late 7 S antibodies in the presence of GAR.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 101 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary The 7 S and 19 S rabbit antibodies to herpes simplex virus (HSV) from early and late (hyperimmune) sera differed in their ability to sensitize virus for subsequent neutralization by either complement (C′) or anti-γ-globulin (GAR). The early 7 S and 19 S antibodies showed low to negligible neutralizing activity in the absence of C′ or GAR. When C′ was added, however, both of these antibodies showed enhanced neutralizing activity. The early 7 S but not the early 19 S antibody was also capable of sensitizing virus for subsequent neutralization by GAR. The late 19 S antibody could neutralize virus in the absence of C′ or GAR, but its activity was enhanced in the presence of C′ or GAR. The late 7 S antibody showed high neutralizing activity in the absence of C′ or GAR. In the presence of C′, the neutralization rate constants (K) but not the neutralization titers of the late 7 S antibody were enhanced. In contrast, the neutralization titers of the late 7 S antibody were enhanced approximately threefold with GAR. The neutralizing activity of the early and late 19 S antibodies with C′ or GAR was sensitive to inactivation by 2-ME. Similarly, the neutralizing activity with C′ of the early 7 S antibody and the enhanced rate of neutralization with C′ of the late 7 S antibody were sensitive to inactivation by 2-ME. In contrast, 2-ME did not reduce the neutralization titers of the early and late 7 S antibodies in the presence of GAR.

Key concepts: Neutralization, Antibody, Neutralizing antibody, Herpes simplex virus, Virology, Titer, Virus, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Heterogeneity in the Properties of 7 S and 19 S Rabbit-Neutralizing Antibodies to Herpes Simplex Virus — Research Paper | ScholarLens