WHITE (HOUSE) LIES: WHY THE PUBLIC MUST COMPEL THE COURTS TO HOLD THE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTABLE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY ABUSES
Eric K. Yamamoto
Abstract
Open-access reader
Eric K. Yamamoto
Abstract
Open-access reader
History teaches us how easily the spectre of a threat to "national security" may be used to justify a wide variety of repressive government actions.A blind acceptance by the courts of the government's insistence on the need for secrecy, without notice to others, without argument, and without a statement of reasons would impermissibly compromise the independence of the judiciary and open the door to possible abuse.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
History teaches us how easily the spectre of a threat to "national security" may be used to justify a wide variety of repressive government actions.A blind acceptance by the courts of the government's insistence on the need for secrecy, without notice to others, without argument, and without a statement of reasons would impermissibly compromise the independence of the judiciary and open the door to possible abuse.
Key concepts: Political science, National security, Scrutiny, Law, Separation of powers, Presidential system, Civil liberties, Accountability