Mixed method research to inform regulatory reform: the case of rail environmental regulation
Tania von der Heidt, Michael B. Charles
Abstract
Tania von der Heidt, Michael B. Charles
Abstract
For the Australian rail industry environmental regulation is a regulatory hotspot. It initiated a project to investigate the case for rail environmental regulatory reform. Research was undertaken in a integrated three-phase research involving mixed methodologies, including in-depth interviewing of 36 rail and government stakeholders across Australia. This paper reports the key findings from each phase. The discussion follows a three-step framework for regulatory reform as a tool to i) map and assess existing regulatory regimes and ii)_develop sound reform options. The quantitative and qualitative findings from all three research phases suggest that the time is ripe for a more co-regulatory approach to rail environmental regulation. The paper is of interest to managers and regulators striving for more sustainable regulatory approaches.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For the Australian rail industry environmental regulation is a regulatory hotspot. It initiated a project to investigate the case for rail environmental regulatory reform. Research was undertaken in a integrated three-phase research involving mixed methodologies, including in-depth interviewing of 36 rail and government stakeholders across Australia. This paper reports the key findings from each phase. The discussion follows a three-step framework for regulatory reform as a tool to i) map and assess existing regulatory regimes and ii)_develop sound reform options. The quantitative and qualitative findings from all three research phases suggest that the time is ripe for a more co-regulatory approach to rail environmental regulation. The paper is of interest to managers and regulators striving for more sustainable regulatory approaches.
Key concepts: Regulatory reform, Environmental regulation, Interview, Government regulation, Business, Government (linguistics), Environmental planning, Environmental resource management