2009•Cross Connect (Southern Cross University)Requires access

Mixed method research to inform regulatory reform: the case of rail environmental regulation

Tania von der Heidt, Michael B. Charles

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

For the Australian rail industry environmental regulation is a regulatory hotspot. It initiated a project to investigate the case for rail environmental regulatory reform. Research was undertaken in a integrated three-phase research involving mixed methodologies, including in-depth interviewing of 36 rail and government stakeholders across Australia. This paper reports the key findings from each phase. The discussion follows a three-step framework for regulatory reform as a tool to i) map and assess existing regulatory regimes and ii)_develop sound reform options. The quantitative and qualitative findings from all three research phases suggest that the time is ripe for a more co-regulatory approach to rail environmental regulation. The paper is of interest to managers and regulators striving for more sustainable regulatory approaches.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For the Australian rail industry environmental regulation is a regulatory hotspot. It initiated a project to investigate the case for rail environmental regulatory reform. Research was undertaken in a integrated three-phase research involving mixed methodologies, including in-depth interviewing of 36 rail and government stakeholders across Australia. This paper reports the key findings from each phase. The discussion follows a three-step framework for regulatory reform as a tool to i) map and assess existing regulatory regimes and ii)_develop sound reform options. The quantitative and qualitative findings from all three research phases suggest that the time is ripe for a more co-regulatory approach to rail environmental regulation. The paper is of interest to managers and regulators striving for more sustainable regulatory approaches.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For the Australian rail industry environmental regulation is a regulatory hotspot. It initiated a project to investigate the case for rail environmental regulatory reform. Research was undertaken in a integrated three-phase research involving mixed methodologies, including in-depth interviewing of 36 rail and government stakeholders across Australia. This paper reports the key findings from each phase. The discussion follows a three-step framework for regulatory reform as a tool to i) map and assess existing regulatory regimes and ii)_develop sound reform options. The quantitative and qualitative findings from all three research phases suggest that the time is ripe for a more co-regulatory approach to rail environmental regulation. The paper is of interest to managers and regulators striving for more sustainable regulatory approaches.

Key concepts: Regulatory reform, Environmental regulation, Interview, Government regulation, Business, Government (linguistics), Environmental planning, Environmental resource management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mixed method research to inform regulatory reform: the case of rail environmental regulation — Research Paper | ScholarLens