2013Unpublished venueOpen access

Global Dynamics at the Zero Lower Bound

William T. Gavin, Benjamin D. Keen, Alexander W. Richter, Nathaniel A. Throckmorton

Open full text 17 citations

Abstract

This article examines monetary policy when it is constrained by the zero lower bound (ZLB) on the nominal interest rate.Our analysis uses a nonlinear New Keynesian model with technology and discount factor shocks.Specifically, we investigate why technology shocks may have unconventional effects at the ZLB, what factors affect the likelihood of hitting the ZLB, and the implications of alternative monetary policy rules.We initially focus on a New Keynesian model without capital (Model 1) and then study that model with capital (Model 2).The advantage of including capital is that it introduces another mechanism for intertemporal substitution that strengthens the expectational effects of the ZLB.Four main findings emerge: (1) In Model 1, the choice of output target in the Taylor rule may reverse the effects of technology shocks when the ZLB binds; (2) When the central bank targets steady-state output in Model 2, a positive technology shock at the ZLB leads to more pronounced unconventional dynamics than in Model 1; (3) The presence of capital changes the qualitative effects of demand shocks and alters the impact of a monetary policy rule that emphasizes output stability; and (4) In Model 1, the constrained linear solution is a decent approximation of the nonlinear solution, but meaningful differences exist between the solutions in Model 2.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article examines monetary policy when it is constrained by the zero lower bound (ZLB) on the nominal interest rate.Our analysis uses a nonlinear New Keynesian model with technology and discount factor shocks.Specifically, we investigate why technology shocks may have unconventional effects at the ZLB, what factors affect the likelihood of hitting the ZLB, and the implications of alternative monetary policy rules.We initially focus on a New Keynesian model without capital (Model 1) and then study that model with capital (Model 2).The advantage of including capital is that it introduces another mechanism for intertemporal substitution that strengthens the expectational effects of the ZLB.Four main findings emerge: (1) In Model 1, the choice of output target in the Taylor rule may reverse the effects of technology shocks when the ZLB binds; (2) When the central bank targets steady-state output in Model 2, a positive technology shock at the ZLB leads to more pronounced unconventional dynamics than in Model 1; (3) The presence of capital changes the qualitative effects of demand shocks and alters the impact of a monetary policy rule that emphasizes output stability; and (4) In Model 1, the constrained linear solution is a decent approximation of the nonlinear solution, but meaningful differences exist between the solutions in Model 2.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article examines monetary policy when it is constrained by the zero lower bound (ZLB) on the nominal interest rate.Our analysis uses a nonlinear New Keynesian model with technology and discount factor shocks.Specifically, we investigate why technology shocks may have unconventional effects at the ZLB, what factors affect the likelihood of hitting the ZLB, and the implications of alternative monetary policy rules.We initially focus on a New Keynesian model without capital (Model 1) and then study that model with capital (Model 2).The advantage of including capital is that it introduces another mechanism for intertemporal substitution that strengthens the expectational effects of the ZLB.Four main findings emerge: (1) In Model 1, the choice of output target in the Taylor rule may reverse the effects of technology shocks when the ZLB binds; (2) When the central bank targets steady-state output in Model 2, a positive technology shock at the ZLB leads to more pronounced unconventional dynamics than in Model 1; (3) The presence of capital changes the qualitative effects of demand shocks and alters the impact of a monetary policy rule that emphasizes output stability; and (4) In Model 1, the constrained linear solution is a decent approximation of the nonlinear solution, but meaningful differences exist between the solutions in Model 2.

Key concepts: Zero (linguistics), Dynamics (music), Zero lower bound, Mathematics, Statistical physics, Physics, Economics, Keynesian economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Global Dynamics at the Zero Lower Bound — Research Paper | ScholarLens