2009AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)Open access

Labour allocation patterns of rural households to agriculture and forest activities in Kakamega district, Western Kenya

Geophrey Sikei, Mark Ollunga Odhiambo, John Olwande, Sikei, Geophrey, Odhiambo, Mark O., Olwande, John

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Communities adjacent to forest are faced with a challenge of balancing their labour allocation decisions to the different household activities. This study was done around Kakamega forest in Western Kenya and examined empirically the factors influencing households’ labour allocation to agriculture, forest and non-farm activities. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data from a random sample of 140 households, on household characteristics and key policy parameters affecting labour allocation. A labour share model similar to standard models of commodity or factor demand was used in estimation. The study findings indicate that wage returns on each activity positively influence labour allocation. Additionally education level of household head has a negative influence on forest and non-farm labour shares while positive on agriculture labour share. Other factors like size of landholding and family size all affect household labour allocation decision. These findings have implications for the type of policies needed to support improved labour supply decisions in the rural sector. Investment in livelihood activities in the rural set-up would largely draw much labour to this sector, hence reduced pressure in the forest ecosystems.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Communities adjacent to forest are faced with a challenge of balancing their labour allocation decisions to the different household activities. This study was done around Kakamega forest in Western Kenya and examined empirically the factors influencing households’ labour allocation to agriculture, forest and non-farm activities. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data from a random sample of 140 households, on household characteristics and key policy parameters affecting labour allocation. A labour share model similar to standard models of commodity or factor demand was used in estimation. The study findings indicate that wage returns on each activity positively influence labour allocation. Additionally education level of household head has a negative influence on forest and non-farm labour shares while positive on agriculture labour share. Other factors like size of landholding and family size all affect household labour allocation decision. These findings have implications for the type of policies needed to support improved labour supply decisions in the rural sector. Investment in livelihood activities in the rural set-up would largely draw much labour to this sector, hence reduced pressure in the forest ecosystems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Communities adjacent to forest are faced with a challenge of balancing their labour allocation decisions to the different household activities. This study was done around Kakamega forest in Western Kenya and examined empirically the factors influencing households’ labour allocation to agriculture, forest and non-farm activities. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data from a random sample of 140 households, on household characteristics and key policy parameters affecting labour allocation. A labour share model similar to standard models of commodity or factor demand was used in estimation. The study findings indicate that wage returns on each activity positively influence labour allocation. Additionally education level of household head has a negative influence on forest and non-farm labour shares while positive on agriculture labour share. Other factors like size of landholding and family size all affect household labour allocation decision. These findings have implications for the type of policies needed to support improved labour supply decisions in the rural sector. Investment in livelihood activities in the rural set-up would largely draw much labour to this sector, hence reduced pressure in the forest ecosystems.

Key concepts: Livelihood, Agriculture, Time allocation, Child labour, Estimation, Wage, Economics, Labour supply

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Labour allocation patterns of rural households to agriculture and forest activities in Kakamega district, Western Kenya — Research Paper | ScholarLens