1977Unpublished venueOpen access

Light Water Reactor Fuel Reprocessing program. Quarterly progress report for the period ending March 31, 1977

J.J. Shefcik

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Standard nozzle plate cartridges were operated under a cross section of light water reactor (LWR) Purex flowsheet conditions to provide baseline data on pulse column throughput capacities. End stream samples were taken for future reference, but efficiency calculations were not made. The main effort was concentrated on the extraction section performance. However, information was also obtained on uranium strip and solvent wash columns, since these are required in a service capacity to allow reuse of both the solvent and the uranium nitrate solution. The major observations from these baseline tests are as follows: (1) The extraction section promises to have high capacity using nozzle plates with either /sup 1///sub 8/- or /sup 3///sub 16/-in. diam holes. No change in capacity was noted as a function of pulse amplitude over the range of 1 to 2 in. (2) The scrub section floods more readily than the extraction section at 1AP solvent loadings above 95 g U/liter. Scrub section flooding can be more easily prevented or cleared using a dual pulse. (3) The uranium strip column has a more limited throughput capacity than the extraction section, as expected. (4) The solvent wash column operation continues to appear promising. No problem, such as those noted in the literature, was observed with very low capacity. The capacity and recoverability from flooding were improved by doubling the pulse amplitude from 1 to 2 in.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Standard nozzle plate cartridges were operated under a cross section of light water reactor (LWR) Purex flowsheet conditions to provide baseline data on pulse column throughput capacities. End stream samples were taken for future reference, but efficiency calculations were not made. The main effort was concentrated on the extraction section performance. However, information was also obtained on uranium strip and solvent wash columns, since these are required in a service capacity to allow reuse of both the solvent and the uranium nitrate solution. The major observations from these baseline tests are as follows: (1) The extraction section promises to have high capacity using nozzle plates with either /sup 1///sub 8/- or /sup 3///sub 16/-in. diam holes. No change in capacity was noted as a function of pulse amplitude over the range of 1 to 2 in. (2) The scrub section floods more readily than the extraction section at 1AP solvent loadings above 95 g U/liter. Scrub section flooding can be more easily prevented or cleared using a dual pulse. (3) The uranium strip column has a more limited throughput capacity than the extraction section, as expected. (4) The solvent wash column operation continues to appear promising. No problem, such as those noted in the literature, was observed with very low capacity. The capacity and recoverability from flooding were improved by doubling the pulse amplitude from 1 to 2 in.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Standard nozzle plate cartridges were operated under a cross section of light water reactor (LWR) Purex flowsheet conditions to provide baseline data on pulse column throughput capacities. End stream samples were taken for future reference, but efficiency calculations were not made. The main effort was concentrated on the extraction section performance. However, information was also obtained on uranium strip and solvent wash columns, since these are required in a service capacity to allow reuse of both the solvent and the uranium nitrate solution. The major observations from these baseline tests are as follows: (1) The extraction section promises to have high capacity using nozzle plates with either /sup 1///sub 8/- or /sup 3///sub 16/-in. diam holes. No change in capacity was noted as a function of pulse amplitude over the range of 1 to 2 in. (2) The scrub section floods more readily than the extraction section at 1AP solvent loadings above 95 g U/liter. Scrub section flooding can be more easily prevented or cleared using a dual pulse. (3) The uranium strip column has a more limited throughput capacity than the extraction section, as expected. (4) The solvent wash column operation continues to appear promising. No problem, such as those noted in the literature, was observed with very low capacity. The capacity and recoverability from flooding were improved by doubling the pulse amplitude from 1 to 2 in.

Key concepts: PUREX, Uranium, Plutonium, Extraction (chemistry), Nozzle, Environmental science, Nuclear engineering, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Light Water Reactor Fuel Reprocessing program. Quarterly progress report for the period ending March 31, 1977 — Research Paper | ScholarLens