2007•Unpublished venueRequires access

Chapter Eight. The Bible In The Making: Slavonic Creation Stories

Florentina Badalanova

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The article focuses on the interface between the Biblical Creation account and Slavonic folk cosmogony, as mirrored in oral tradition. Exploring the encounter between the Holy Scriptures and ethnopoetics, it approaches phenomena of popular faith which exemplify correspondences between the written accounts of the Book of Genesis (both canonical and apocryphal versions), and their oral expression through vernacular language(s). In this, it examines the relationship between Holy Writ and its oral counterparts. It could be argued that the Slavonic folklore version of the Book of Genesis not only exemplify the encounters between the written canon and the local oral traditions, but also represents the unfolding of a certain oral Ur-hypertext, the earliest existence of which preceded the actual formation of the Biblical text itself. This oral Ur-hypertext provided the fabric and created context from which the written text of the Bible eventually sprang. This Ur-hypertext did not only beget, foster and nourish the corpus of texts which letter formed the written body of the Bible, but also survived to the present day in oral traditions of many religious communities as clusters of verbal and ritual texts constituting the framework of their belief systems. Slavonic oral tradition represents one such case.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article focuses on the interface between the Biblical Creation account and Slavonic folk cosmogony, as mirrored in oral tradition. Exploring the encounter between the Holy Scriptures and ethnopoetics, it approaches phenomena of popular faith which exemplify correspondences between the written accounts of the Book of Genesis (both canonical and apocryphal versions), and their oral expression through vernacular language(s). In this, it examines the relationship between Holy Writ and its oral counterparts. It could be argued that the Slavonic folklore version of the Book of Genesis not only exemplify the encounters between the written canon and the local oral traditions, but also represents the unfolding of a certain oral Ur-hypertext, the earliest existence of which preceded the actual formation of the Biblical text itself. This oral Ur-hypertext provided the fabric and created context from which the written text of the Bible eventually sprang. This Ur-hypertext did not only beget, foster and nourish the corpus of texts which letter formed the written body of the Bible, but also survived to the present day in oral traditions of many religious communities as clusters of verbal and ritual texts constituting the framework of their belief systems. Slavonic oral tradition represents one such case.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article focuses on the interface between the Biblical Creation account and Slavonic folk cosmogony, as mirrored in oral tradition. Exploring the encounter between the Holy Scriptures and ethnopoetics, it approaches phenomena of popular faith which exemplify correspondences between the written accounts of the Book of Genesis (both canonical and apocryphal versions), and their oral expression through vernacular language(s). In this, it examines the relationship between Holy Writ and its oral counterparts. It could be argued that the Slavonic folklore version of the Book of Genesis not only exemplify the encounters between the written canon and the local oral traditions, but also represents the unfolding of a certain oral Ur-hypertext, the earliest existence of which preceded the actual formation of the Biblical text itself. This oral Ur-hypertext provided the fabric and created context from which the written text of the Bible eventually sprang. This Ur-hypertext did not only beget, foster and nourish the corpus of texts which letter formed the written body of the Bible, but also survived to the present day in oral traditions of many religious communities as clusters of verbal and ritual texts constituting the framework of their belief systems. Slavonic oral tradition represents one such case.

Key concepts: History, Literature, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Chapter Eight. The Bible In The Making: Slavonic Creation Stories — Research Paper | ScholarLens