2006Unpublished venueRequires access

A new neck injury criterion in combined vertical/frontal crashes with head supported mass

Cameron R. Bass, Lucy Donnellan, Robert Scott Salzar, Scott R. Lucas, B Folk, Martin B. Davis, Karin A. Rafaels, Chris Planchak, Kevin Meyerhoff, Andrzej Wojciech Ziemba

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

This study developed a new neck injury risk function suitable for use in frontal crashes with occupant orientation ranging from predominantly horizontal to predominantly vertical in the occupant anterior-posterior (A/P) direction. In this study, 36 cadaveric head/neck complexes and 6 whole cadavers were tested under impact scenarios with varying total head mounted mass and center of gravity locations. Matched Hybrid III and THOR dummy tests were also performed. The resulting injury criterion is based on a beam model of the lower cervical spine and is expressed in mathematical form. The calculated values were comparable to single axis injury tolerance values described in the literature and in existing motor vehicle injury standards for the upper cervical spine (FMVSS-208, 2003). Beam criterion values (BC) of 1.0 correspond to a 50% risk of an AIS 2 injury in the human cervical spine. The THOR dummy was found to reproduce the kinematics of the cadaver better than did the Hybrid III dummy. However, response curves showed differences between the THOR and the cadaver that were due to anatomy. For the covering abstract see ITRD E141569.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study developed a new neck injury risk function suitable for use in frontal crashes with occupant orientation ranging from predominantly horizontal to predominantly vertical in the occupant anterior-posterior (A/P) direction. In this study, 36 cadaveric head/neck complexes and 6 whole cadavers were tested under impact scenarios with varying total head mounted mass and center of gravity locations. Matched Hybrid III and THOR dummy tests were also performed. The resulting injury criterion is based on a beam model of the lower cervical spine and is expressed in mathematical form. The calculated values were comparable to single axis injury tolerance values described in the literature and in existing motor vehicle injury standards for the upper cervical spine (FMVSS-208, 2003). Beam criterion values (BC) of 1.0 correspond to a 50% risk of an AIS 2 injury in the human cervical spine. The THOR dummy was found to reproduce the kinematics of the cadaver better than did the Hybrid III dummy. However, response curves showed differences between the THOR and the cadaver that were due to anatomy. For the covering abstract see ITRD E141569.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study developed a new neck injury risk function suitable for use in frontal crashes with occupant orientation ranging from predominantly horizontal to predominantly vertical in the occupant anterior-posterior (A/P) direction. In this study, 36 cadaveric head/neck complexes and 6 whole cadavers were tested under impact scenarios with varying total head mounted mass and center of gravity locations. Matched Hybrid III and THOR dummy tests were also performed. The resulting injury criterion is based on a beam model of the lower cervical spine and is expressed in mathematical form. The calculated values were comparable to single axis injury tolerance values described in the literature and in existing motor vehicle injury standards for the upper cervical spine (FMVSS-208, 2003). Beam criterion values (BC) of 1.0 correspond to a 50% risk of an AIS 2 injury in the human cervical spine. The THOR dummy was found to reproduce the kinematics of the cadaver better than did the Hybrid III dummy. However, response curves showed differences between the THOR and the cadaver that were due to anatomy. For the covering abstract see ITRD E141569.

Key concepts: Cadaver, Cadaveric spasm, Hybrid III, Kinematics, Anatomy, Cervical spine, Biomechanics, Cervical vertebrae

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A new neck injury criterion in combined vertical/frontal crashes with head supported mass — Research Paper | ScholarLens