2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

U.S.-NATO Command and Control: An AD HOC Relationship

Marshall Denney, III

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Although the United States should be prepared to operate within the framework of an alliance or coalition under other-than-US leadership, American forces will probably be the most capable force and will therefore be expected to play a central leadership role. The standing NATO C2 structure, however, does not adequately account for disparities between U.S. and NATO military capabilities, the heightened requirement for U.S. operational security, or for divergences in national priorities. Without a codified C2 arrangement suitable to both the U.S. and NATO, an ad hoc arrangement will follow just as it occurred in Operation Allied Force. The best solution is for NATO to standardize and codify Combined Joint Task Forces (CJTF) for peacekeeping and to standardize and codify a different CJTF for major operations that will involve the U.S.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although the United States should be prepared to operate within the framework of an alliance or coalition under other-than-US leadership, American forces will probably be the most capable force and will therefore be expected to play a central leadership role. The standing NATO C2 structure, however, does not adequately account for disparities between U.S. and NATO military capabilities, the heightened requirement for U.S. operational security, or for divergences in national priorities. Without a codified C2 arrangement suitable to both the U.S. and NATO, an ad hoc arrangement will follow just as it occurred in Operation Allied Force. The best solution is for NATO to standardize and codify Combined Joint Task Forces (CJTF) for peacekeeping and to standardize and codify a different CJTF for major operations that will involve the U.S.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although the United States should be prepared to operate within the framework of an alliance or coalition under other-than-US leadership, American forces will probably be the most capable force and will therefore be expected to play a central leadership role. The standing NATO C2 structure, however, does not adequately account for disparities between U.S. and NATO military capabilities, the heightened requirement for U.S. operational security, or for divergences in national priorities. Without a codified C2 arrangement suitable to both the U.S. and NATO, an ad hoc arrangement will follow just as it occurred in Operation Allied Force. The best solution is for NATO to standardize and codify Combined Joint Task Forces (CJTF) for peacekeeping and to standardize and codify a different CJTF for major operations that will involve the U.S.

Key concepts: Command and control, Political science, Computer science, Telecommunications

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
U.S.-NATO Command and Control: An AD HOC Relationship — Research Paper | ScholarLens