2010•FLASH - Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship & History (Fordham University)Open access

Representation in Mediation: What We Know From Empirical Research

Roselle L. Wissler

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

This Article first describes the proportion of unrepresented parties in mediation and the policies and practices regarding representation in different mediation contexts. The core of the Article examines the empirical findings on the effect of representation on several dimensions of the mediation process, including the effect on preparation for mediation, party perceptions of the fairness of the process and pressures to settle, the extent of party "voice" and participation in mediation, and the tone of the session. In addition, the Article examines the effect of representation on mediation outcomes, including the likelihood of settlement and the fairness of agreements reached. The Article concludes with a discussion of the findings, the limitations of existing studies, and the additional research that is needed to inform policies and practices regarding representation in mediation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This Article first describes the proportion of unrepresented parties in mediation and the policies and practices regarding representation in different mediation contexts. The core of the Article examines the empirical findings on the effect of representation on several dimensions of the mediation process, including the effect on preparation for mediation, party perceptions of the fairness of the process and pressures to settle, the extent of party "voice" and participation in mediation, and the tone of the session. In addition, the Article examines the effect of representation on mediation outcomes, including the likelihood of settlement and the fairness of agreements reached. The Article concludes with a discussion of the findings, the limitations of existing studies, and the additional research that is needed to inform policies and practices regarding representation in mediation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This Article first describes the proportion of unrepresented parties in mediation and the policies and practices regarding representation in different mediation contexts. The core of the Article examines the empirical findings on the effect of representation on several dimensions of the mediation process, including the effect on preparation for mediation, party perceptions of the fairness of the process and pressures to settle, the extent of party "voice" and participation in mediation, and the tone of the session. In addition, the Article examines the effect of representation on mediation outcomes, including the likelihood of settlement and the fairness of agreements reached. The Article concludes with a discussion of the findings, the limitations of existing studies, and the additional research that is needed to inform policies and practices regarding representation in mediation.

Key concepts: Mediation, Settlement (finance), Representation (politics), Party-directed mediation, Empirical research, Political science, Process (computing), Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Representation in Mediation: What We Know From Empirical Research — Research Paper | ScholarLens