1967•Unpublished venueOpen access

EVALUATION OF TWO INSTRUMENT-LANDING DISPLAYS IN SIMULATED IFR APPROACHES WITH A HELICOPTER

William Gracey

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Two instrument displays that differed principally in the manner in which course guidance was presented have been evaluated in landing approaches with a helicopter. In one display, course guidance information was presented as a flight-director command on a conventional cross-pointer indicator; in the other display, the information was presented on a moving-map indicator. The tests of the two displays were conducted under simulated IFR conditions along a 6° glide slope at approach airspeeds of about 30 knots. The approaches were carried to a 50-foot breakout and a visual slowdown to hover. The results of the tests are presented in terms of (1) flight performance (i.e., tracking along slope and course) and (2) pilot evaluation of the display concepts. The implications of the results to the design of improved displays are discussed.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two instrument displays that differed principally in the manner in which course guidance was presented have been evaluated in landing approaches with a helicopter. In one display, course guidance information was presented as a flight-director command on a conventional cross-pointer indicator; in the other display, the information was presented on a moving-map indicator. The tests of the two displays were conducted under simulated IFR conditions along a 6° glide slope at approach airspeeds of about 30 knots. The approaches were carried to a 50-foot breakout and a visual slowdown to hover. The results of the tests are presented in terms of (1) flight performance (i.e., tracking along slope and course) and (2) pilot evaluation of the display concepts. The implications of the results to the design of improved displays are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two instrument displays that differed principally in the manner in which course guidance was presented have been evaluated in landing approaches with a helicopter. In one display, course guidance information was presented as a flight-director command on a conventional cross-pointer indicator; in the other display, the information was presented on a moving-map indicator. The tests of the two displays were conducted under simulated IFR conditions along a 6° glide slope at approach airspeeds of about 30 knots. The approaches were carried to a 50-foot breakout and a visual slowdown to hover. The results of the tests are presented in terms of (1) flight performance (i.e., tracking along slope and course) and (2) pilot evaluation of the display concepts. The implications of the results to the design of improved displays are discussed.

Key concepts: Computer science, Aeronautics, Environmental science, Remote sensing, Engineering, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EVALUATION OF TWO INSTRUMENT-LANDING DISPLAYS IN SIMULATED IFR APPROACHES WITH A HELICOPTER — Research Paper | ScholarLens