The Challenge Ahead: Increasing Predictability in Federal Circuit Jurisprudence for the New Century
Paúl Míchel
Abstract
Open-access reader
Paúl Míchel
Abstract
Open-access reader
University Law Review's annual volume devoted to recent decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.By producing this volume, the Review provides a service to the Federal Circuit, its bar, government officials, commentators, and others.Because The American University Law Review began publishing this volume soon after the creation of our country's only federal appellate court based on subject matter jurisdiction, it is the "review of record" for the Federal Circuit.This year, as before, the many fine contributions to the volume manifest the high quality of our bar, as well as the skill of the Review's staff.The thoughts presented in this Article, however, should be attributed neither to the Review, to other contributors to this volume, nor to the court.They are strictly my own.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
University Law Review's annual volume devoted to recent decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.By producing this volume, the Review provides a service to the Federal Circuit, its bar, government officials, commentators, and others.Because The American University Law Review began publishing this volume soon after the creation of our country's only federal appellate court based on subject matter jurisdiction, it is the "review of record" for the Federal Circuit.This year, as before, the many fine contributions to the volume manifest the high quality of our bar, as well as the skill of the Review's staff.The thoughts presented in this Article, however, should be attributed neither to the Review, to other contributors to this volume, nor to the court.They are strictly my own.
Key concepts: Jurisprudence, Predictability, Law, Political science, Law and economics, Economics, Mathematics, Statistics