Business Methods and Patentable Subject Matter following In re Bilski: Is Anything under the Sun Made by Man Really Patentable
Robert A. McFarlane, Robert G. Litts
Abstract
Open-access reader
Robert A. McFarlane, Robert G. Litts
Abstract
Open-access reader
The Federal Circuit's decision in In re Bilski sought to answer once and for all whether, and to what extent, business methods may be patented and to articulate the standard that governs the patentability of all processes.The court's majority opinion both confirmed that there is no exclusion preventing the patenting of business methods and announced a new "machine-ortransformation" test to analyze patents on processes in all fields.Given the controversy surrounding this decision, it is not surprising that the Supreme Court subsequently granted certiorari.This article first reviews the Federal Circuit's Bilski decision, including its historical context and its ramifications in defining what may be patented.It then considers the questions facing the Supreme Court by addressing some of the criticisms of the Federal Circuit's majority decision.Finally, it offers a solution that conforms to Supreme Court precedent and Constitutional requirements.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The Federal Circuit's decision in In re Bilski sought to answer once and for all whether, and to what extent, business methods may be patented and to articulate the standard that governs the patentability of all processes.The court's majority opinion both confirmed that there is no exclusion preventing the patenting of business methods and announced a new "machine-ortransformation" test to analyze patents on processes in all fields.Given the controversy surrounding this decision, it is not surprising that the Supreme Court subsequently granted certiorari.This article first reviews the Federal Circuit's Bilski decision, including its historical context and its ramifications in defining what may be patented.It then considers the questions facing the Supreme Court by addressing some of the criticisms of the Federal Circuit's majority decision.Finally, it offers a solution that conforms to Supreme Court precedent and Constitutional requirements.
Key concepts: Patentable subject matter, Patentability, Supreme court, Statute, Law, Law and economics, Intellectual property, Abandonment (legal)