2011•Hope College Digital Commons (Hope College)Requires access

Coaching Communication: Effects of Different Coaching Styles on Athletes

Lindy Melville, Patrick Robey, Kenichiro Kawakami, Ben Lemmen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Because every person communicates differently, no one person responds to messages the same exact way as someone else. Communication is especially important in the world of sports. Athletes need to talk and relate to their teammates both on and off the court. It is also very important for athletes to respect and connect to their coach. However, establishing a productive athlete-coach relationship is not always easy because there are many different coaching styles across sports. Many times, coaching techniques can strongly impact the team’s chemistry. Some coaches shout at their team using a command speaking style, while other coaches have a cooperative communication style. With this background in mind, this project examined what Hope College student athletes believe is the best coaching communication style. The research group interviewed athletes from almost every Hope male and female team, asking their opinions about coaching styles and the styles’ impact on team chemistry, cohesion, and performance. The qualitative interview analysis revealed two findings: Cooperative coaching is the most common coaching style at Hope, and that student athletes had very different responses to coaching styles. Finally, the study found that it is difficult to predict which coaching style will be more productive because it depends on the athletes and how they respond to their leader.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Because every person communicates differently, no one person responds to messages the same exact way as someone else. Communication is especially important in the world of sports. Athletes need to talk and relate to their teammates both on and off the court. It is also very important for athletes to respect and connect to their coach. However, establishing a productive athlete-coach relationship is not always easy because there are many different coaching styles across sports. Many times, coaching techniques can strongly impact the team’s chemistry. Some coaches shout at their team using a command speaking style, while other coaches have a cooperative communication style. With this background in mind, this project examined what Hope College student athletes believe is the best coaching communication style. The research group interviewed athletes from almost every Hope male and female team, asking their opinions about coaching styles and the styles’ impact on team chemistry, cohesion, and performance. The qualitative interview analysis revealed two findings: Cooperative coaching is the most common coaching style at Hope, and that student athletes had very different responses to coaching styles. Finally, the study found that it is difficult to predict which coaching style will be more productive because it depends on the athletes and how they respond to their leader.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Because every person communicates differently, no one person responds to messages the same exact way as someone else. Communication is especially important in the world of sports. Athletes need to talk and relate to their teammates both on and off the court. It is also very important for athletes to respect and connect to their coach. However, establishing a productive athlete-coach relationship is not always easy because there are many different coaching styles across sports. Many times, coaching techniques can strongly impact the team’s chemistry. Some coaches shout at their team using a command speaking style, while other coaches have a cooperative communication style. With this background in mind, this project examined what Hope College student athletes believe is the best coaching communication style. The research group interviewed athletes from almost every Hope male and female team, asking their opinions about coaching styles and the styles’ impact on team chemistry, cohesion, and performance. The qualitative interview analysis revealed two findings: Cooperative coaching is the most common coaching style at Hope, and that student athletes had very different responses to coaching styles. Finally, the study found that it is difficult to predict which coaching style will be more productive because it depends on the athletes and how they respond to their leader.

Key concepts: Coaching, Athletes, Psychology, Applied psychology, Physical therapy, Medicine, Psychotherapist

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coaching Communication: Effects of Different Coaching Styles on Athletes — Research Paper | ScholarLens