National strategies for nuclear power reactor development
Richard K. Lester, Michael J. Driscoll, M.W. Golay, David D. Lanning, Lawrence M. Lidsky
Abstract
Richard K. Lester, Michael J. Driscoll, M.W. Golay, David D. Lanning, Lawrence M. Lidsky
Abstract
The document assesses the potential for design innovation in three areas of nuclear power plant technology: light-water reactor systems; liquid-metal reactor systems; and high-temperature-gas reactor systems. The question of how capital costs scale with unit size in nuclear power reactor systems is addressed. Small modular high temperature gas reactor designs are reviewed, and an electric-power-system capacity-planning model that allows estimates to be made of the economic implications of construction lead time and power rating variations for utility ratepayers and shareholders is presented. The effects of industrial reorganization and structure on the economic performance of the nuclear power industry in the U.S. is explored, and options available to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for establishing the general philosphy, technical criteria, and organizational approach to the regulation of a new generation of nuclear power plants are discussed. Light-water-reactor systems are determined to be the only plausible technical option if nuclear power is to figure in the capacity expansion plans of U.S. electric utilities in the near term.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The document assesses the potential for design innovation in three areas of nuclear power plant technology: light-water reactor systems; liquid-metal reactor systems; and high-temperature-gas reactor systems. The question of how capital costs scale with unit size in nuclear power reactor systems is addressed. Small modular high temperature gas reactor designs are reviewed, and an electric-power-system capacity-planning model that allows estimates to be made of the economic implications of construction lead time and power rating variations for utility ratepayers and shareholders is presented. The effects of industrial reorganization and structure on the economic performance of the nuclear power industry in the U.S. is explored, and options available to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for establishing the general philosphy, technical criteria, and organizational approach to the regulation of a new generation of nuclear power plants are discussed. Light-water-reactor systems are determined to be the only plausible technical option if nuclear power is to figure in the capacity expansion plans of U.S. electric utilities in the near term.
Key concepts: Nuclear power, Modular design, Nuclear reactor, Light-water reactor, Capital cost, Electric power, Pressurized water reactor, Electric power system