2013•European Scientific Journal ESJOpen access

IMAGE, PERSON, AND THE PRECONCEIVED NOTION OF MONOTHEISM; A COMPARATIVE APPROACH

Madeea Axinciuc

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The study revisits, in a critical and creative manner pertaining mainly to philosophy of religion and comparative religion, the notions of image, idolatry, and person, laying emphasis on their tight connection to (re)defining and (re)tracing the essential features of monotheism. The preconceived, popular and/ or theological, misunderstanding of key-terms evoked in ‘monotheistic’ discourses or applied with regard to ‘other’ religious traditions (than the Abrahamic ‘monotheisms’) highlights the necessity to thoroughly and adequately re-approach the religious phenomenon and its various expressions in diverse traditions, by re-contextualizing, in scientific, non-apologetic and non-confessional ways, the relation with the ‘divine’ when envisaged as a unifying experience. In this framework, the connection with ‘the One’, the emergence of personal God, and the notion of ‘chosen people’ are attentively reconsidered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The study revisits, in a critical and creative manner pertaining mainly to philosophy of religion and comparative religion, the notions of image, idolatry, and person, laying emphasis on their tight connection to (re)defining and (re)tracing the essential features of monotheism. The preconceived, popular and/ or theological, misunderstanding of key-terms evoked in ‘monotheistic’ discourses or applied with regard to ‘other’ religious traditions (than the Abrahamic ‘monotheisms’) highlights the necessity to thoroughly and adequately re-approach the religious phenomenon and its various expressions in diverse traditions, by re-contextualizing, in scientific, non-apologetic and non-confessional ways, the relation with the ‘divine’ when envisaged as a unifying experience. In this framework, the connection with ‘the One’, the emergence of personal God, and the notion of ‘chosen people’ are attentively reconsidered.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The study revisits, in a critical and creative manner pertaining mainly to philosophy of religion and comparative religion, the notions of image, idolatry, and person, laying emphasis on their tight connection to (re)defining and (re)tracing the essential features of monotheism. The preconceived, popular and/ or theological, misunderstanding of key-terms evoked in ‘monotheistic’ discourses or applied with regard to ‘other’ religious traditions (than the Abrahamic ‘monotheisms’) highlights the necessity to thoroughly and adequately re-approach the religious phenomenon and its various expressions in diverse traditions, by re-contextualizing, in scientific, non-apologetic and non-confessional ways, the relation with the ‘divine’ when envisaged as a unifying experience. In this framework, the connection with ‘the One’, the emergence of personal God, and the notion of ‘chosen people’ are attentively reconsidered.

Key concepts: Monotheism, Idolatry, Confessional, Relation (database), Epistemology, Key (lock), Synonym (taxonomy), Phenomenon

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
IMAGE, PERSON, AND THE PRECONCEIVED NOTION OF MONOTHEISM; A COMPARATIVE APPROACH — Research Paper | ScholarLens