1987Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

A Systems Analysis of Fire Suppression Alternatives for the U.S. Space Station

Joseph Sheridan

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

NASA's 'front line' defense against fire abroad manned spacecraft has been strict control of materials, construction, and operation. This will continue with the space station, but the inclusion of laboratory facilities and crew comfort features combined with the increasing 'routine-ization' of space operations will increase the risk of fire. A safe, effective fire suppression system must be included. Every previous manned U.S. spacecraft has had some type of fire supression capability, but these may not be the best for the station. For example, the space shuttle orbiters carry both fixed and portable Halon 1301 systems. Because of the toxicity of compounds produced when Halon 1301 reacts at high temperature with combustion products, NASA policy is to terminate the shuttle mission if a fixed system is discharged, even if the fire is extinguished.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

NASA's 'front line' defense against fire abroad manned spacecraft has been strict control of materials, construction, and operation. This will continue with the space station, but the inclusion of laboratory facilities and crew comfort features combined with the increasing 'routine-ization' of space operations will increase the risk of fire. A safe, effective fire suppression system must be included. Every previous manned U.S. spacecraft has had some type of fire supression capability, but these may not be the best for the station. For example, the space shuttle orbiters carry both fixed and portable Halon 1301 systems. Because of the toxicity of compounds produced when Halon 1301 reacts at high temperature with combustion products, NASA policy is to terminate the shuttle mission if a fixed system is discharged, even if the fire is extinguished.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

NASA's 'front line' defense against fire abroad manned spacecraft has been strict control of materials, construction, and operation. This will continue with the space station, but the inclusion of laboratory facilities and crew comfort features combined with the increasing 'routine-ization' of space operations will increase the risk of fire. A safe, effective fire suppression system must be included. Every previous manned U.S. spacecraft has had some type of fire supression capability, but these may not be the best for the station. For example, the space shuttle orbiters carry both fixed and portable Halon 1301 systems. Because of the toxicity of compounds produced when Halon 1301 reacts at high temperature with combustion products, NASA policy is to terminate the shuttle mission if a fixed system is discharged, even if the fire is extinguished.

Key concepts: Aeronautics, Spacecraft, Crew, Space Shuttle, International Space Station, Environmental science, Space Station Freedom, Fire protection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Systems Analysis of Fire Suppression Alternatives for the U.S. Space Station — Research Paper | ScholarLens