2003RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpen access

New challenges in regional development - the role of regional institutions

Veronika Gaube, Sabine Sedlacek

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The paper is based on an institutional survey in Austria. The aim of the survey was to identify different types of regional institutions- traditional versus new innovative institutions. The main research focus concentrated on new challenges in regional development processes resulting from the EU-strategy to foster sustainable regional development in the member states. As a consequence the question of the relevance of completely new types of institutions arises on the one hand. These new types are directly linked to the EU structural fund policy, e.g. LEADER+ manager, EU regional manager. With respect to this focus these institutions mainly concentrate on EU programmes and initiatives. On the other hand the traditional institutions have their specific focus on e.g. tourism, economic development etc. not necessarily with any direct link to EU-programmes. Therefore this contribution starts with a general institutional analysis (i.e. organisational attributes, activity profiles, regional embeddedness, position in the regional stakeholder network, etc.) to find differences between traditional and new innovative institutions. Based on these attributes we will present the institutional landscape in Austrian regions. This landscape consists of the above mentioned traditional and the new innovative institutions. Are these co-existing institutions able to concentrate the top-down (i.e. regional policy) and the bottom-up (i.e. project initiatives) interests in order to foster sustainable regional initiatives? For answering this question we have chosen several case-studies in different Austrian regions. This case study analysis will be presented as follows: Strengths and weaknesses of different institutional settings (e.g. various competing institutions versus one strong institution) Comparison of strategic decisions in the case study regions Is there any ideal solution identifiable for other regions? 21.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper is based on an institutional survey in Austria. The aim of the survey was to identify different types of regional institutions- traditional versus new innovative institutions. The main research focus concentrated on new challenges in regional development processes resulting from the EU-strategy to foster sustainable regional development in the member states. As a consequence the question of the relevance of completely new types of institutions arises on the one hand. These new types are directly linked to the EU structural fund policy, e.g. LEADER+ manager, EU regional manager. With respect to this focus these institutions mainly concentrate on EU programmes and initiatives. On the other hand the traditional institutions have their specific focus on e.g. tourism, economic development etc. not necessarily with any direct link to EU-programmes. Therefore this contribution starts with a general institutional analysis (i.e. organisational attributes, activity profiles, regional embeddedness, position in the regional stakeholder network, etc.) to find differences between traditional and new innovative institutions. Based on these attributes we will present the institutional landscape in Austrian regions. This landscape consists of the above mentioned traditional and the new innovative institutions. Are these co-existing institutions able to concentrate the top-down (i.e. regional policy) and the bottom-up (i.e. project initiatives) interests in order to foster sustainable regional initiatives? For answering this question we have chosen several case-studies in different Austrian regions. This case study analysis will be presented as follows: Strengths and weaknesses of different institutional settings (e.g. various competing institutions versus one strong institution) Comparison of strategic decisions in the case study regions Is there any ideal solution identifiable for other regions? 21.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper is based on an institutional survey in Austria. The aim of the survey was to identify different types of regional institutions- traditional versus new innovative institutions. The main research focus concentrated on new challenges in regional development processes resulting from the EU-strategy to foster sustainable regional development in the member states. As a consequence the question of the relevance of completely new types of institutions arises on the one hand. These new types are directly linked to the EU structural fund policy, e.g. LEADER+ manager, EU regional manager. With respect to this focus these institutions mainly concentrate on EU programmes and initiatives. On the other hand the traditional institutions have their specific focus on e.g. tourism, economic development etc. not necessarily with any direct link to EU-programmes. Therefore this contribution starts with a general institutional analysis (i.e. organisational attributes, activity profiles, regional embeddedness, position in the regional stakeholder network, etc.) to find differences between traditional and new innovative institutions. Based on these attributes we will present the institutional landscape in Austrian regions. This landscape consists of the above mentioned traditional and the new innovative institutions. Are these co-existing institutions able to concentrate the top-down (i.e. regional policy) and the bottom-up (i.e. project initiatives) interests in order to foster sustainable regional initiatives? For answering this question we have chosen several case-studies in different Austrian regions. This case study analysis will be presented as follows: Strengths and weaknesses of different institutional settings (e.g. various competing institutions versus one strong institution) Comparison of strategic decisions in the case study regions Is there any ideal solution identifiable for other regions? 21.

Key concepts: Embeddedness, Regional science, Position (finance), Regional policy, Sustainable regional development, SWOT analysis, Stakeholder, Relevance (law)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
New challenges in regional development - the role of regional institutions — Research Paper | ScholarLens