2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Surveillance for foodborne diseases: PART 1: Approaches to surveillance for foodborne diseases

Elaine Scallan, Barbara E. Mahon, Danilo Lo Fo Wong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Foodborne disease continues to be an important global public health problem. Surveillance is essential to efforts to measure, control, and prevent foodborne disease. Capacity is increased with the increasing complexity of the surveillance system, which can be classified on a spectrum ranging from no formal surveillance to syndromic surveillance, laboratory-based surveillance, and, finally, integrated food-chain surveillance. While syndromic surveillance is usually not specific enough for most foodborne surveillance needs, it may be useful in countries with insufficient resources to establish laboratory-based surveillance. Specific strategies for surveillance include: (1) routine surveillance for notifiable diseases, (2) subtyping of pathogens, (3) sentinel site surveillance, (4) hospital discharge records and death registration, (5) foodborne disease complaints systems, and (6) outbreak reports. This chapter describes the advantages, disadvantages, and relevance of these surveillance strategies for various public health situations and objectives. Additional uses of surveillance data, opportunities for improving foodborne disease surveillance, and efforts to enhance surveillance internationally are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Foodborne disease continues to be an important global public health problem. Surveillance is essential to efforts to measure, control, and prevent foodborne disease. Capacity is increased with the increasing complexity of the surveillance system, which can be classified on a spectrum ranging from no formal surveillance to syndromic surveillance, laboratory-based surveillance, and, finally, integrated food-chain surveillance. While syndromic surveillance is usually not specific enough for most foodborne surveillance needs, it may be useful in countries with insufficient resources to establish laboratory-based surveillance. Specific strategies for surveillance include: (1) routine surveillance for notifiable diseases, (2) subtyping of pathogens, (3) sentinel site surveillance, (4) hospital discharge records and death registration, (5) foodborne disease complaints systems, and (6) outbreak reports. This chapter describes the advantages, disadvantages, and relevance of these surveillance strategies for various public health situations and objectives. Additional uses of surveillance data, opportunities for improving foodborne disease surveillance, and efforts to enhance surveillance internationally are discussed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Foodborne disease continues to be an important global public health problem. Surveillance is essential to efforts to measure, control, and prevent foodborne disease. Capacity is increased with the increasing complexity of the surveillance system, which can be classified on a spectrum ranging from no formal surveillance to syndromic surveillance, laboratory-based surveillance, and, finally, integrated food-chain surveillance. While syndromic surveillance is usually not specific enough for most foodborne surveillance needs, it may be useful in countries with insufficient resources to establish laboratory-based surveillance. Specific strategies for surveillance include: (1) routine surveillance for notifiable diseases, (2) subtyping of pathogens, (3) sentinel site surveillance, (4) hospital discharge records and death registration, (5) foodborne disease complaints systems, and (6) outbreak reports. This chapter describes the advantages, disadvantages, and relevance of these surveillance strategies for various public health situations and objectives. Additional uses of surveillance data, opportunities for improving foodborne disease surveillance, and efforts to enhance surveillance internationally are discussed.

Key concepts: Disease surveillance, Public health surveillance, Notifiable disease, Outbreak, Environmental health, Epidemiological surveillance, Public health, Epidemiologic Surveillance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Surveillance for foodborne diseases: PART 1: Approaches to surveillance for foodborne diseases — Research Paper | ScholarLens