1994Parking: the magazine of the parking industryRequires access

A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO ON-STREET PARKING ENFORCEMENT: ADDED REVENUE SHOULD NOT BE THE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE /

Jim Kennedy

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

On-street parking enforcement policies are frequently driven by the prospects of increased revenue. While this may be especially tempting in these times of severe budget reductions, it is not in the best interest of either the organization or its customers. Emphasis on managing parking enforcement to generate revenues may conflict with the principal objectives of providing public parking. On-street parking should be viewed as a sub-system of the overall parking management system. Enforcement policies should evolve. And they should be based on the dynamics of the system. Increased revenue should merely be a by-product. The author provides two detailed exhibits; 1) outlines the on-street parking enforcement sub-system, composed of numerous interrelated functions that are influenced by a variety of inputs; and 2) summarizes the types of enforcement identified, the current and desired levels of enforcement coverage, the required resources and number of citations associated with each parking restriction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On-street parking enforcement policies are frequently driven by the prospects of increased revenue. While this may be especially tempting in these times of severe budget reductions, it is not in the best interest of either the organization or its customers. Emphasis on managing parking enforcement to generate revenues may conflict with the principal objectives of providing public parking. On-street parking should be viewed as a sub-system of the overall parking management system. Enforcement policies should evolve. And they should be based on the dynamics of the system. Increased revenue should merely be a by-product. The author provides two detailed exhibits; 1) outlines the on-street parking enforcement sub-system, composed of numerous interrelated functions that are influenced by a variety of inputs; and 2) summarizes the types of enforcement identified, the current and desired levels of enforcement coverage, the required resources and number of citations associated with each parking restriction.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On-street parking enforcement policies are frequently driven by the prospects of increased revenue. While this may be especially tempting in these times of severe budget reductions, it is not in the best interest of either the organization or its customers. Emphasis on managing parking enforcement to generate revenues may conflict with the principal objectives of providing public parking. On-street parking should be viewed as a sub-system of the overall parking management system. Enforcement policies should evolve. And they should be based on the dynamics of the system. Increased revenue should merely be a by-product. The author provides two detailed exhibits; 1) outlines the on-street parking enforcement sub-system, composed of numerous interrelated functions that are influenced by a variety of inputs; and 2) summarizes the types of enforcement identified, the current and desired levels of enforcement coverage, the required resources and number of citations associated with each parking restriction.

Key concepts: Enforcement, Revenue, Business, Variety (cybernetics), Product (mathematics), Principal (computer security), Transport engineering, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO ON-STREET PARKING ENFORCEMENT: ADDED REVENUE SHOULD NOT BE THE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE / — Research Paper | ScholarLens