2008The Journal of Sexual MedicineRequires access

Female Sexual Dysfunction, Sexual Distress, and Compatibility with Partner

Katarina Witting, Pekka Santtila, Markus Varjonen, Patrick Jern, A Johansson, Bettina von der Pahlen, Kenneth Sandnabba

Open publisher page 238 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have looked at prevalence estimates for female sexual dysfunctions in combination with personal distress, although existing diagnostic criteria for sexual disorders include both aspects. Further, the variation in female sexual function has been shown to be largely explained by unique nongenetic factors. Such factors may include partner sexual function and perception of sexual compatibility with a partner, factors which may also be associated with sexual distress. AIM: We investigated the association between female sexual dysfunction and distress as well as their association with partner compatibility. METHODS: In order to assess sexual function and distress, the Female Sexual Function Index and seven items from the Female Sexual Distress Scale were used in a population-based sample of 5,463 women, aged 18-49 years. The women were, based on cutoff points, classified as either having neither dysfunction nor distress, one of them, or both, separately for each dysfunction. Further, the associations between partner compatibility, distress, and sexual dysfunctions were analyzed. Sexual compatibility with partner was investigated by using several items exploring, for example, amount of foreplay, interest in sex, and communication about sexual matters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between partner compatibility and female sexual function and sexual distress. RESULTS: The proportion of women reporting both sexual dysfunction and distress ranged from 7% to 23%, depending on the dysfunction. Desire disorders followed by orgasmic disorders were most common. All compatibility variables were significantly associated with distress and with most of the sexual dysfunctions. The main complaints of the women were "too little foreplay" (42%) and "partner is more interested" (35%). The women feeling distress or having a sexual dysfunction reported more incompatibility with partner compared with functional women. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the importance of addressing partner compatibility for successful treatment and counseling of female sexual dysfunctions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have looked at prevalence estimates for female sexual dysfunctions in combination with personal distress, although existing diagnostic criteria for sexual disorders include both aspects. Further, the variation in female sexual function has been shown to be largely explained by unique nongenetic factors. Such factors may include partner sexual function and perception of sexual compatibility with a partner, factors which may also be associated with sexual distress. AIM: We investigated the association between female sexual dysfunction and distress as well as their association with partner compatibility. METHODS: In order to assess sexual function and distress, the Female Sexual Function Index and seven items from the Female Sexual Distress Scale were used in a population-based sample of 5,463 women, aged 18-49 years. The women were, based on cutoff points, classified as either having neither dysfunction nor distress, one of them, or both, separately for each dysfunction. Further, the associations between partner compatibility, distress, and sexual dysfunctions were analyzed. Sexual compatibility with partner was investigated by using several items exploring, for example, amount of foreplay, interest in sex, and communication about sexual matters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between partner compatibility and female sexual function and sexual distress. RESULTS: The proportion of women reporting both sexual dysfunction and distress ranged from 7% to 23%, depending on the dysfunction. Desire disorders followed by orgasmic disorders were most common. All compatibility variables were significantly associated with distress and with most of the sexual dysfunctions. The main complaints of the women were "too little foreplay" (42%) and "partner is more interested" (35%). The women feeling distress or having a sexual dysfunction reported more incompatibility with partner compared with functional women. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the importance of addressing partner compatibility for successful treatment and counseling of female sexual dysfunctions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 238 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have looked at prevalence estimates for female sexual dysfunctions in combination with personal distress, although existing diagnostic criteria for sexual disorders include both aspects. Further, the variation in female sexual function has been shown to be largely explained by unique nongenetic factors. Such factors may include partner sexual function and perception of sexual compatibility with a partner, factors which may also be associated with sexual distress. AIM: We investigated the association between female sexual dysfunction and distress as well as their association with partner compatibility. METHODS: In order to assess sexual function and distress, the Female Sexual Function Index and seven items from the Female Sexual Distress Scale were used in a population-based sample of 5,463 women, aged 18-49 years. The women were, based on cutoff points, classified as either having neither dysfunction nor distress, one of them, or both, separately for each dysfunction. Further, the associations between partner compatibility, distress, and sexual dysfunctions were analyzed. Sexual compatibility with partner was investigated by using several items exploring, for example, amount of foreplay, interest in sex, and communication about sexual matters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between partner compatibility and female sexual function and sexual distress. RESULTS: The proportion of women reporting both sexual dysfunction and distress ranged from 7% to 23%, depending on the dysfunction. Desire disorders followed by orgasmic disorders were most common. All compatibility variables were significantly associated with distress and with most of the sexual dysfunctions. The main complaints of the women were "too little foreplay" (42%) and "partner is more interested" (35%). The women feeling distress or having a sexual dysfunction reported more incompatibility with partner compared with functional women. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the importance of addressing partner compatibility for successful treatment and counseling of female sexual dysfunctions.

Key concepts: Distress, Psychology, Sexual dysfunction, Compatibility (geochemistry), Clinical psychology, Psychiatry, Engineering, Chemical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Female Sexual Dysfunction, Sexual Distress, and Compatibility with Partner — Research Paper | ScholarLens