2006•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Toward a Theory of Intertribal and Intratribal Common Law

Matthew L. M. Fletcher

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Courts and scholars refer to the substantive common law applied by tribal courts in the United States using the monolithic term "tribal common law," but in fact tribal common law can and should be subdivided into two major categories of law – "intertribal common law" and "intratribal common law." "Intertribal common law" is the common law applied by tribal courts to cases arising out of Anglo-American legal constructs, such as employment contracts or housing leases. "Intratribal common law" is the common law applied by tribal courts to cases arising out of indigenous legal constructs, such as family and inheritance rules or land use rights. Intertribal common law tends to mirror state and federal common law, while intratribal common law derives from the unique and often unwritten tribal customs and traditions. Almost by definition, intratribal common law does not and cannot apply to disputes involving nonmembers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Courts and scholars refer to the substantive common law applied by tribal courts in the United States using the monolithic term "tribal common law," but in fact tribal common law can and should be subdivided into two major categories of law – "intertribal common law" and "intratribal common law." "Intertribal common law" is the common law applied by tribal courts to cases arising out of Anglo-American legal constructs, such as employment contracts or housing leases. "Intratribal common law" is the common law applied by tribal courts to cases arising out of indigenous legal constructs, such as family and inheritance rules or land use rights. Intertribal common law tends to mirror state and federal common law, while intratribal common law derives from the unique and often unwritten tribal customs and traditions. Almost by definition, intratribal common law does not and cannot apply to disputes involving nonmembers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Courts and scholars refer to the substantive common law applied by tribal courts in the United States using the monolithic term "tribal common law," but in fact tribal common law can and should be subdivided into two major categories of law – "intertribal common law" and "intratribal common law." "Intertribal common law" is the common law applied by tribal courts to cases arising out of Anglo-American legal constructs, such as employment contracts or housing leases. "Intratribal common law" is the common law applied by tribal courts to cases arising out of indigenous legal constructs, such as family and inheritance rules or land use rights. Intertribal common law tends to mirror state and federal common law, while intratribal common law derives from the unique and often unwritten tribal customs and traditions. Almost by definition, intratribal common law does not and cannot apply to disputes involving nonmembers.

Key concepts: Common law, Law, Federal common law, Jurisdiction, Civil law (Civil law), Political science, Supreme court, Precedent

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Toward a Theory of Intertribal and Intratribal Common Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens