1999Unpublished venueRequires access

Modals, Raising And A-Reconstruction

Susi Wurmbrand, Jonathan David Bobaljik

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

• Raising vs. control is often correlated with different modal interpretations (though see Barbiers 1995 for arguments against this claim) Ross (1969): root modals are transitive, epistemic modals are intransitive Roberts (1985): deontic modals assign a(n adjunct) theta role, epistemic modals do not assign a theta role (2) Basic modal interpretations a. John must be the leak in the FBI epistemic preferred (in view of the available evidence ...) b. According to FBI regulations, FBI agents must wear suits root/deontic preferred (in view of what the law provides ...) • root/deontic: express modal forces like permission, obligation, ability etc. • epistemic: evaluation/qualification of the likelihood of the embedded proposition according to what we believe/know about the facts, background, situation, world etc. Susi Wurmbrand & Jonathan David Bobaljik

About this research paper

What this paper is about

• Raising vs. control is often correlated with different modal interpretations (though see Barbiers 1995 for arguments against this claim) Ross (1969): root modals are transitive, epistemic modals are intransitive Roberts (1985): deontic modals assign a(n adjunct) theta role, epistemic modals do not assign a theta role (2) Basic modal interpretations a. John must be the leak in the FBI epistemic preferred (in view of the available evidence ...) b. According to FBI regulations, FBI agents must wear suits root/deontic preferred (in view of what the law provides ...) • root/deontic: express modal forces like permission, obligation, ability etc. • epistemic: evaluation/qualification of the likelihood of the embedded proposition according to what we believe/know about the facts, background, situation, world etc. Susi Wurmbrand & Jonathan David Bobaljik

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

• Raising vs. control is often correlated with different modal interpretations (though see Barbiers 1995 for arguments against this claim) Ross (1969): root modals are transitive, epistemic modals are intransitive Roberts (1985): deontic modals assign a(n adjunct) theta role, epistemic modals do not assign a theta role (2) Basic modal interpretations a. John must be the leak in the FBI epistemic preferred (in view of the available evidence ...) b. According to FBI regulations, FBI agents must wear suits root/deontic preferred (in view of what the law provides ...) • root/deontic: express modal forces like permission, obligation, ability etc. • epistemic: evaluation/qualification of the likelihood of the embedded proposition according to what we believe/know about the facts, background, situation, world etc. Susi Wurmbrand & Jonathan David Bobaljik

Key concepts: Deontic logic, Modal verb, Raising (metalworking), Transitive relation, Proposition, Obligation, Epistemology, Modal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modals, Raising And A-Reconstruction — Research Paper | ScholarLens