1973•Unpublished venueRequires access

COMPUTER SIMULATION EVALUATION OF VISIBILITY DISTANCES PROVIDED BY THREE HEADLAMP SYSTEMS

Rudolf G. Mortimer

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

A COMPUTER SIMULATION EVALUATION OF THE VISIBILITY DISTANCES PROVIDED BY THREE HEADLIGHTING SYSTEMS IS DESCRIBED. TWO OF THE HEADLIGHTING SYSTEMS CONSISTED OF LOW, MID AND HIGH BEAMS, AND THE OTHER OF LOW AND HIGH BEAMS. A CURRENTLY USED LOW AND HIGH BEAM (TYPE 6014) SYSTEM WAS ALSO EVALUATED, FOR COMPARISON WITH THE EXPERIMENTAL BEAMS. VISIBILITY DISTANCES WERE DERVIED, BEFORE AND AFTER MEETING AN OPPOSING VEHICLE WITH THE SAME HEADLIGHTS ON A STRAIGHT ROAD FOR TARGETS AT THE RIGHT SIDE AND CENTER OF THE LANE. LOW AND MID BEAMS PRODUCED GREATER VISIBILITY DISTANCES TO THE RIGHT TARGET THAN IN THE CENTER OF THE LANE, WHEREAS HIGH BEAMS WERE MOSTLY UNAFFECTED BY TARGET LOCATION. OVERALL, MID BEAMS PRODUCED ABOUT 10 PERCENT GREATER VISIBILITY DISTANCES THAN THE LOW BEAMS. THE TYPE 6014 LOW BEAM PRODUCED EQUAL OR GREATER VISIBILITY THAN THE EXPERIMENTAL LOW BEAMS, WHILE ITS HIGH BEAM WAS INTERMEDIATE IN EFFECTIVENCES COMPARED TO THE OTHER SYSTEMS. /AUTHOR/

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A COMPUTER SIMULATION EVALUATION OF THE VISIBILITY DISTANCES PROVIDED BY THREE HEADLIGHTING SYSTEMS IS DESCRIBED. TWO OF THE HEADLIGHTING SYSTEMS CONSISTED OF LOW, MID AND HIGH BEAMS, AND THE OTHER OF LOW AND HIGH BEAMS. A CURRENTLY USED LOW AND HIGH BEAM (TYPE 6014) SYSTEM WAS ALSO EVALUATED, FOR COMPARISON WITH THE EXPERIMENTAL BEAMS. VISIBILITY DISTANCES WERE DERVIED, BEFORE AND AFTER MEETING AN OPPOSING VEHICLE WITH THE SAME HEADLIGHTS ON A STRAIGHT ROAD FOR TARGETS AT THE RIGHT SIDE AND CENTER OF THE LANE. LOW AND MID BEAMS PRODUCED GREATER VISIBILITY DISTANCES TO THE RIGHT TARGET THAN IN THE CENTER OF THE LANE, WHEREAS HIGH BEAMS WERE MOSTLY UNAFFECTED BY TARGET LOCATION. OVERALL, MID BEAMS PRODUCED ABOUT 10 PERCENT GREATER VISIBILITY DISTANCES THAN THE LOW BEAMS. THE TYPE 6014 LOW BEAM PRODUCED EQUAL OR GREATER VISIBILITY THAN THE EXPERIMENTAL LOW BEAMS, WHILE ITS HIGH BEAM WAS INTERMEDIATE IN EFFECTIVENCES COMPARED TO THE OTHER SYSTEMS. /AUTHOR/

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A COMPUTER SIMULATION EVALUATION OF THE VISIBILITY DISTANCES PROVIDED BY THREE HEADLIGHTING SYSTEMS IS DESCRIBED. TWO OF THE HEADLIGHTING SYSTEMS CONSISTED OF LOW, MID AND HIGH BEAMS, AND THE OTHER OF LOW AND HIGH BEAMS. A CURRENTLY USED LOW AND HIGH BEAM (TYPE 6014) SYSTEM WAS ALSO EVALUATED, FOR COMPARISON WITH THE EXPERIMENTAL BEAMS. VISIBILITY DISTANCES WERE DERVIED, BEFORE AND AFTER MEETING AN OPPOSING VEHICLE WITH THE SAME HEADLIGHTS ON A STRAIGHT ROAD FOR TARGETS AT THE RIGHT SIDE AND CENTER OF THE LANE. LOW AND MID BEAMS PRODUCED GREATER VISIBILITY DISTANCES TO THE RIGHT TARGET THAN IN THE CENTER OF THE LANE, WHEREAS HIGH BEAMS WERE MOSTLY UNAFFECTED BY TARGET LOCATION. OVERALL, MID BEAMS PRODUCED ABOUT 10 PERCENT GREATER VISIBILITY DISTANCES THAN THE LOW BEAMS. THE TYPE 6014 LOW BEAM PRODUCED EQUAL OR GREATER VISIBILITY THAN THE EXPERIMENTAL LOW BEAMS, WHILE ITS HIGH BEAM WAS INTERMEDIATE IN EFFECTIVENCES COMPARED TO THE OTHER SYSTEMS. /AUTHOR/

Key concepts: Visibility, Headlamp, Beam (structure), Optics, Retroreflector, Engineering, Physics, Laser

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPUTER SIMULATION EVALUATION OF VISIBILITY DISTANCES PROVIDED BY THREE HEADLAMP SYSTEMS — Research Paper | ScholarLens