2011Energy EngineeringRequires access

Reducing Energy Supply In The Drying Process

Sc. Rajka Budin, Sc. Alka Mihelić-Bogdanić

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

After a detailed analysis of original industrial drying (the most common form) as an energy intensive process, the possibilities for the reduction of fuel consumption are documented. This is done because, after conventional drying, where hot air is usually discharged into the atmosphere, there is great potential for heat saving via exhaust-to-supply air heat exchangers. Thus, the conventional process is compared with ones using recuperation and recirculation that increase drying efficiency. Reclaiming heat from the exhaust results in fuel savings of 28% in the recuperative drying process, and the fuel consumption is lowered by 24% in the proposed recirculative option. Improved efficiency is also evident from the calculations presented, with savings of about 51% for recuperation and about 49% for recirculation. With these options, energy-saving activities also result in improvements of the production process with respect to environmental impacts. From the presented calculations, it follows that the recuperative drying concept is technically feasible and capable of achieving a better efficiency compared to a simple recirculative system. The presented modifications compared with commonly used conventional dryers make it possible to realize consistent fuel savings through elimination of exhaust air losses. Implementation of the proposed heat recovery options system has fully confirmed the achieved results described in this article.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After a detailed analysis of original industrial drying (the most common form) as an energy intensive process, the possibilities for the reduction of fuel consumption are documented. This is done because, after conventional drying, where hot air is usually discharged into the atmosphere, there is great potential for heat saving via exhaust-to-supply air heat exchangers. Thus, the conventional process is compared with ones using recuperation and recirculation that increase drying efficiency. Reclaiming heat from the exhaust results in fuel savings of 28% in the recuperative drying process, and the fuel consumption is lowered by 24% in the proposed recirculative option. Improved efficiency is also evident from the calculations presented, with savings of about 51% for recuperation and about 49% for recirculation. With these options, energy-saving activities also result in improvements of the production process with respect to environmental impacts. From the presented calculations, it follows that the recuperative drying concept is technically feasible and capable of achieving a better efficiency compared to a simple recirculative system. The presented modifications compared with commonly used conventional dryers make it possible to realize consistent fuel savings through elimination of exhaust air losses. Implementation of the proposed heat recovery options system has fully confirmed the achieved results described in this article.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After a detailed analysis of original industrial drying (the most common form) as an energy intensive process, the possibilities for the reduction of fuel consumption are documented. This is done because, after conventional drying, where hot air is usually discharged into the atmosphere, there is great potential for heat saving via exhaust-to-supply air heat exchangers. Thus, the conventional process is compared with ones using recuperation and recirculation that increase drying efficiency. Reclaiming heat from the exhaust results in fuel savings of 28% in the recuperative drying process, and the fuel consumption is lowered by 24% in the proposed recirculative option. Improved efficiency is also evident from the calculations presented, with savings of about 51% for recuperation and about 49% for recirculation. With these options, energy-saving activities also result in improvements of the production process with respect to environmental impacts. From the presented calculations, it follows that the recuperative drying concept is technically feasible and capable of achieving a better efficiency compared to a simple recirculative system. The presented modifications compared with commonly used conventional dryers make it possible to realize consistent fuel savings through elimination of exhaust air losses. Implementation of the proposed heat recovery options system has fully confirmed the achieved results described in this article.

Key concepts: Process engineering, Heat exchanger, Process (computing), Heat recovery ventilation, Fuel efficiency, Efficient energy use, Environmental science, Exhaust gas

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reducing Energy Supply In The Drying Process — Research Paper | ScholarLens