2002•Water Resources ResearchRequires access

Woody debris and channel morphology in first‐ and second‐order forested channels in Washington's coast ranges

C. Rhett Jackson, Christopher A. Sturm

Open publisher page 117 citations

Abstract

While there are conceptual and theoretical reasons to believe small streams behave differently than larger streams, the lack of information on small streams has lead land managers to rely on data from larger streams to guide management decisions. In response to the need for descriptive information on habitat and channel morphology specific to small, non‐fish‐bearing streams in the Pacific Northwest, morphologies and wood frequencies in 42 first‐ and second‐order forested streams <4 m wide were surveyed. Frequencies and size distributions of woody debris were compared between small streams and larger fish‐bearing streams as well as between second‐growth and virgin timber streams. Statistical models were developed to explore dominant factors affecting channel morphology and habitat. Findings suggest geomorphological relationships, specifically the role of woody debris in habitat formation, documented for larger streams do not apply to headwater streams. Relatively small wood (diameters between 10 and 40 cm), inorganic material, and organic debris (diameters <10 cm) were major step‐forming agents while big woody debris pieces (>40 cm diameter) created <10% of steps. Streams in virgin and managed stands did not differ in relative importance of very large woody debris. Because of low fluvial power, pool habitat was rare. These streams featured mostly step‐riffle morphology, not step‐pool, indicating insufficient both flow for pool‐scour. Stream power and unit stream power were dominant channel shaping factors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While there are conceptual and theoretical reasons to believe small streams behave differently than larger streams, the lack of information on small streams has lead land managers to rely on data from larger streams to guide management decisions. In response to the need for descriptive information on habitat and channel morphology specific to small, non‐fish‐bearing streams in the Pacific Northwest, morphologies and wood frequencies in 42 first‐ and second‐order forested streams <4 m wide were surveyed. Frequencies and size distributions of woody debris were compared between small streams and larger fish‐bearing streams as well as between second‐growth and virgin timber streams. Statistical models were developed to explore dominant factors affecting channel morphology and habitat. Findings suggest geomorphological relationships, specifically the role of woody debris in habitat formation, documented for larger streams do not apply to headwater streams. Relatively small wood (diameters between 10 and 40 cm), inorganic material, and organic debris (diameters <10 cm) were major step‐forming agents while big woody debris pieces (>40 cm diameter) created <10% of steps. Streams in virgin and managed stands did not differ in relative importance of very large woody debris. Because of low fluvial power, pool habitat was rare. These streams featured mostly step‐riffle morphology, not step‐pool, indicating insufficient both flow for pool‐scour. Stream power and unit stream power were dominant channel shaping factors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 117 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While there are conceptual and theoretical reasons to believe small streams behave differently than larger streams, the lack of information on small streams has lead land managers to rely on data from larger streams to guide management decisions. In response to the need for descriptive information on habitat and channel morphology specific to small, non‐fish‐bearing streams in the Pacific Northwest, morphologies and wood frequencies in 42 first‐ and second‐order forested streams <4 m wide were surveyed. Frequencies and size distributions of woody debris were compared between small streams and larger fish‐bearing streams as well as between second‐growth and virgin timber streams. Statistical models were developed to explore dominant factors affecting channel morphology and habitat. Findings suggest geomorphological relationships, specifically the role of woody debris in habitat formation, documented for larger streams do not apply to headwater streams. Relatively small wood (diameters between 10 and 40 cm), inorganic material, and organic debris (diameters <10 cm) were major step‐forming agents while big woody debris pieces (>40 cm diameter) created <10% of steps. Streams in virgin and managed stands did not differ in relative importance of very large woody debris. Because of low fluvial power, pool habitat was rare. These streams featured mostly step‐riffle morphology, not step‐pool, indicating insufficient both flow for pool‐scour. Stream power and unit stream power were dominant channel shaping factors.

Key concepts: STREAMS, Large woody debris, Debris, Stream power, Channel (broadcasting), Coarse woody debris, Environmental science, Habitat

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Woody debris and channel morphology in first‐ and second‐order forested channels in Washington's coast ranges — Research Paper | ScholarLens