Factors Affecting Business Process and Business Rule Integration
Wei Wang, Marta Indulska, Shazia Wasim Sadiq
Abstract
Open-access reader
Wei Wang, Marta Indulska, Shazia Wasim Sadiq
Abstract
Open-access reader
Information systems architectures are becoming increasingly complex and fragmented. As a result, organizations struggle to cope with change propagation, compliance management and interoperability, to name a few. Two major components in current information system architectures are business process models and business rules. In practice, redundancy and inconsistency in business rule and business process models exists, highlighting the need for integrated modelling of business processes and business rules. An important pre-requisite of achieving integrated modelling is the ability to decide whether a rule should be embedded into a business process model or modelled independently in a rule repository. In current literature, little guidance can be found that can help modellers make such a decision. We identify this gap as a shortcoming that contributes to fragmented information system architectures and argue that to understand such a decision process, one needs to first identify the factors that can affect the decision. Accordingly, in this paper, we embark on a systematic review of process modelling and business rule modelling literature to identify such factors. Our work uncovered twelve factors and is a stepping-stone to developing a decision framework for business process model and business rule integration, and towards improved information system architectures.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Information systems architectures are becoming increasingly complex and fragmented. As a result, organizations struggle to cope with change propagation, compliance management and interoperability, to name a few. Two major components in current information system architectures are business process models and business rules. In practice, redundancy and inconsistency in business rule and business process models exists, highlighting the need for integrated modelling of business processes and business rules. An important pre-requisite of achieving integrated modelling is the ability to decide whether a rule should be embedded into a business process model or modelled independently in a rule repository. In current literature, little guidance can be found that can help modellers make such a decision. We identify this gap as a shortcoming that contributes to fragmented information system architectures and argue that to understand such a decision process, one needs to first identify the factors that can affect the decision. Accordingly, in this paper, we embark on a systematic review of process modelling and business rule modelling literature to identify such factors. Our work uncovered twelve factors and is a stepping-stone to developing a decision framework for business process model and business rule integration, and towards improved information system architectures.
Key concepts: Business rule, Business process modeling, Artifact-centric business process model, Business process management, Business process, Computer science, Business process discovery, Business Process Model and Notation