2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Flexible Learning Object Metadata

Christopher Brooks, Gordon McCalla, M G Winter

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

By far the most popular specification for learning objects is the IEEE Learning Object Metadata (LOM) standard. In it are outlined 76 different elements that correspond to pedagogical, technical, and administrative aspects of learning objects. This standard, however, has proven to be ineffective for creating computer adapted dynamic courseware. This paper outlines some initialr esear ch we ar e d oing in acquir ing, descr ibing, and using lear ning object metadata. Instead of the IEEE LOM, we ar gue for a mor e flexible appr oach to both defining and associating metadata with lear ning objects. By cr eating domain, educational, and lear ner char acter istic ontologies, content can be dynamically linked to those competencies that ar e o bser ved in ar unning e-lear ning system. This pr ovides for a set of evolutionar y me tadata, wher e softwar e agents can inspect multiple metadata instances for a given lea r ning object andr eason over them for a par ticular goal. As more metadata instances are added to the system, agents are expected to be able to provide more accurate reasoning, eventually leading to the dynamic delivery of personalized course content.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

By far the most popular specification for learning objects is the IEEE Learning Object Metadata (LOM) standard. In it are outlined 76 different elements that correspond to pedagogical, technical, and administrative aspects of learning objects. This standard, however, has proven to be ineffective for creating computer adapted dynamic courseware. This paper outlines some initialr esear ch we ar e d oing in acquir ing, descr ibing, and using lear ning object metadata. Instead of the IEEE LOM, we ar gue for a mor e flexible appr oach to both defining and associating metadata with lear ning objects. By cr eating domain, educational, and lear ner char acter istic ontologies, content can be dynamically linked to those competencies that ar e o bser ved in ar unning e-lear ning system. This pr ovides for a set of evolutionar y me tadata, wher e softwar e agents can inspect multiple metadata instances for a given lea r ning object andr eason over them for a par ticular goal. As more metadata instances are added to the system, agents are expected to be able to provide more accurate reasoning, eventually leading to the dynamic delivery of personalized course content.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

By far the most popular specification for learning objects is the IEEE Learning Object Metadata (LOM) standard. In it are outlined 76 different elements that correspond to pedagogical, technical, and administrative aspects of learning objects. This standard, however, has proven to be ineffective for creating computer adapted dynamic courseware. This paper outlines some initialr esear ch we ar e d oing in acquir ing, descr ibing, and using lear ning object metadata. Instead of the IEEE LOM, we ar gue for a mor e flexible appr oach to both defining and associating metadata with lear ning objects. By cr eating domain, educational, and lear ner char acter istic ontologies, content can be dynamically linked to those competencies that ar e o bser ved in ar unning e-lear ning system. This pr ovides for a set of evolutionar y me tadata, wher e softwar e agents can inspect multiple metadata instances for a given lea r ning object andr eason over them for a par ticular goal. As more metadata instances are added to the system, agents are expected to be able to provide more accurate reasoning, eventually leading to the dynamic delivery of personalized course content.

Key concepts: Metadata, Learning object, Computer science, Metadata repository, Object (grammar), Meta Data Services, Set (abstract data type), Domain (mathematical analysis)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Flexible Learning Object Metadata — Research Paper | ScholarLens