2015Review of Development EconomicsRequires access

Inequality and Saving: Further Evidence from Integrated Economies

Xinhua Gu, Bihong Huang, Pui Sun Tam, Yang Zhang

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Renewed attention to inequality and saving has arisen owing to their pronounced implications for global imbalances and financial crises. We show that the relationship between saving and inequality is negative if savers' funds are borrowed by spending households for consumption as in theUSA, but positive if saving is allocated through financial systems to investing firms for production as inChina. This theoretical result is largely consistent with empirical evidence found from these two increasingly integrated economies and other related countries by estimating panel‐data models. The policy implication is that inequality must be reduced in order to increase saving in theUSAand otherOrganisation forEconomicCo‐operation andDevelopment (OECD) countries and to boost consumption in China and other parts of emergingAsia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Renewed attention to inequality and saving has arisen owing to their pronounced implications for global imbalances and financial crises. We show that the relationship between saving and inequality is negative if savers' funds are borrowed by spending households for consumption as in theUSA, but positive if saving is allocated through financial systems to investing firms for production as inChina. This theoretical result is largely consistent with empirical evidence found from these two increasingly integrated economies and other related countries by estimating panel‐data models. The policy implication is that inequality must be reduced in order to increase saving in theUSAand otherOrganisation forEconomicCo‐operation andDevelopment (OECD) countries and to boost consumption in China and other parts of emergingAsia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Renewed attention to inequality and saving has arisen owing to their pronounced implications for global imbalances and financial crises. We show that the relationship between saving and inequality is negative if savers' funds are borrowed by spending households for consumption as in theUSA, but positive if saving is allocated through financial systems to investing firms for production as inChina. This theoretical result is largely consistent with empirical evidence found from these two increasingly integrated economies and other related countries by estimating panel‐data models. The policy implication is that inequality must be reduced in order to increase saving in theUSAand otherOrganisation forEconomicCo‐operation andDevelopment (OECD) countries and to boost consumption in China and other parts of emergingAsia.

Key concepts: Economics, Inequality, Consumption (sociology), Order (exchange), Production (economics), Empirical evidence, Economic inequality, China

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Inequality and Saving: Further Evidence from Integrated Economies — Research Paper | ScholarLens