2003•The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)Requires access

EXCITED BENDING STATES OF HeOCS

Kelly J. Higgins, Zhenhong Yu, William Klemperèr, C. A. Gottlieb

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A great deal of research in the area of helium nanodroplet spectroscopy has focused on OCS as the $chromophore.^{a}$ Detailed modeling of the behavior of OCS in a nanodroplet depends on an accurate He-OCS intermolecular potential covering the full range of the angular coordinate. Several potentials have recently been presented in the $literature,^{b,c,d}$ complemented by experimental work in the $microwave^{b}$ and $infrared.^{e}$ All three potentials are qualitatively similar, with the global minimum in a T-shaped configuration and two secondary wells at either end of the OCS. The ground state is predicted and observed to be T-shaped, the first excited bending state is predicted to be localized on the O end, and the second excited state is predicted to be localized on the S end. One of the main differences between the three potentials is the predicted energy difference between the ground state and the excited bending states, with the predictions ranging from $4.3 cm^{-1}$(Ref. c) to $8.8 cm^{-1}$(Ref. b) for the first bending state. This energy difference reflects both the difference in the relative well depths and the stiffness of the potential in the wells. Molecular beam electric resonance experiments in the mm-wave region are currently underway to determine the exact energy difference between the ground state and the first two excited bending states of HeOCS.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A great deal of research in the area of helium nanodroplet spectroscopy has focused on OCS as the $chromophore.^{a}$ Detailed modeling of the behavior of OCS in a nanodroplet depends on an accurate He-OCS intermolecular potential covering the full range of the angular coordinate. Several potentials have recently been presented in the $literature,^{b,c,d}$ complemented by experimental work in the $microwave^{b}$ and $infrared.^{e}$ All three potentials are qualitatively similar, with the global minimum in a T-shaped configuration and two secondary wells at either end of the OCS. The ground state is predicted and observed to be T-shaped, the first excited bending state is predicted to be localized on the O end, and the second excited state is predicted to be localized on the S end. One of the main differences between the three potentials is the predicted energy difference between the ground state and the excited bending states, with the predictions ranging from $4.3 cm^{-1}$(Ref. c) to $8.8 cm^{-1}$(Ref. b) for the first bending state. This energy difference reflects both the difference in the relative well depths and the stiffness of the potential in the wells. Molecular beam electric resonance experiments in the mm-wave region are currently underway to determine the exact energy difference between the ground state and the first two excited bending states of HeOCS.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A great deal of research in the area of helium nanodroplet spectroscopy has focused on OCS as the $chromophore.^{a}$ Detailed modeling of the behavior of OCS in a nanodroplet depends on an accurate He-OCS intermolecular potential covering the full range of the angular coordinate. Several potentials have recently been presented in the $literature,^{b,c,d}$ complemented by experimental work in the $microwave^{b}$ and $infrared.^{e}$ All three potentials are qualitatively similar, with the global minimum in a T-shaped configuration and two secondary wells at either end of the OCS. The ground state is predicted and observed to be T-shaped, the first excited bending state is predicted to be localized on the O end, and the second excited state is predicted to be localized on the S end. One of the main differences between the three potentials is the predicted energy difference between the ground state and the excited bending states, with the predictions ranging from $4.3 cm^{-1}$(Ref. c) to $8.8 cm^{-1}$(Ref. b) for the first bending state. This energy difference reflects both the difference in the relative well depths and the stiffness of the potential in the wells. Molecular beam electric resonance experiments in the mm-wave region are currently underway to determine the exact energy difference between the ground state and the first two excited bending states of HeOCS.

Key concepts: Excited state, Chemistry, Physics, Atomic physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EXCITED BENDING STATES OF HeOCS — Research Paper | ScholarLens