ScholarLens Back to search
1995•Indiana Magazine of History (Indiana University)Open access

Discretion in Capital Sentencing Instructions: Guided or Misguided?

James E. R. Luginbuhl, Julie A. Howe

Open full text 36 citations

Abstract

Symposium: The Capital Jury Project

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Symposium: The Capital Jury Project

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Symposium: The Capital Jury Project

Key concepts: Discretion, Capital (architecture), Economics, Judicial discretion, Capital punishment, Law and economics, Sentencing guidelines, Law

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discretion in Capital Sentencing Instructions: Guided or Misguided? — Research Paper | ScholarLens