2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Concurrent message passing in communicating sequential processes

M. Ahuja, Amitabh Sinha

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The authors examine a model of concurrency among concurrent sequential processes with asynchronous message sending done using ordinary and FLUSH message passing primitives. Using two paradigms, the authors show that FLUSH primitives permit more accurate modeling of problem situations than synchronous message passing. They also show that FLUSH message passing primitives allow for a greater concurrency in message passing than synchronous message passing primitives. An implementation of the primitives using counters is outlined.>

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The authors examine a model of concurrency among concurrent sequential processes with asynchronous message sending done using ordinary and FLUSH message passing primitives. Using two paradigms, the authors show that FLUSH primitives permit more accurate modeling of problem situations than synchronous message passing. They also show that FLUSH message passing primitives allow for a greater concurrency in message passing than synchronous message passing primitives. An implementation of the primitives using counters is outlined.>

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The authors examine a model of concurrency among concurrent sequential processes with asynchronous message sending done using ordinary and FLUSH message passing primitives. Using two paradigms, the authors show that FLUSH primitives permit more accurate modeling of problem situations than synchronous message passing. They also show that FLUSH message passing primitives allow for a greater concurrency in message passing than synchronous message passing primitives. An implementation of the primitives using counters is outlined.>

Key concepts: Message passing, Asynchronous communication, Concurrency, Computer science, Message broker, Concurrent computing, Parallel computing, Distributed computing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Concurrent message passing in communicating sequential processes — Research Paper | ScholarLens