Practical significance (effect sizes) versus or in combination with statistical significance (p-values) : research note
Samuel Ellis, H.S. Steyn
Abstract
Samuel Ellis, H.S. Steyn
Abstract
Statistical significance tests have a tendency to yield small p-values (indicating significance) as the size of the data sets increase. The effect size is independent of sample size and is a measure of practical significance. It can be understood as a large enough effect to be important in practice and is described for differences in means as well as for the relationship in two-way frequency tables and also for a multiple regression fit.
OpenAlex reports 253 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Statistical significance tests have a tendency to yield small p-values (indicating significance) as the size of the data sets increase. The effect size is independent of sample size and is a measure of practical significance. It can be understood as a large enough effect to be important in practice and is described for differences in means as well as for the relationship in two-way frequency tables and also for a multiple regression fit.
Key concepts: Statistical significance, Statistics, Sample size determination, Significance testing, Mathematics, Statistical hypothesis testing, Econometrics, Regression analysis