Water-saving and high-yield mechanism of tomato under different irrigation methods
Yan Wang, Huanjie Cai, Xinming Chen, Jian Zheng, Hong Ji
Abstract
Yan Wang, Huanjie Cai, Xinming Chen, Jian Zheng, Hong Ji
Abstract
本文研究了无压灌、滴灌与沟灌3种灌水方式对番茄光合生理指标、根系吸导水能力、产量与水分利用效率的影响。结果表明,“少量多次”的无压灌下植物根系导水率高于滴灌与沟灌灌水方式, 无压灌能够通过调节作物根区土壤水分状况, 提高作物根系吸水能力, 使作物根区土壤水分保持在最适宜作物生长的范围内。无压灌和滴灌的番茄叶绿素总量比沟灌分别提高了16.2%和12.8%; 相对沟灌, 无压灌和滴灌减小了气孔导度和蒸腾失水, 而未降低光合速率, 单叶水分利用效率分别提高51.3%和17.2%。投入、产出和效率综合评判表明, 无压灌的经济效益最好, 滴灌次之, 沟灌最差。
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
本文研究了无压灌、滴灌与沟灌3种灌水方式对番茄光合生理指标、根系吸导水能力、产量与水分利用效率的影响。结果表明,“少量多次”的无压灌下植物根系导水率高于滴灌与沟灌灌水方式, 无压灌能够通过调节作物根区土壤水分状况, 提高作物根系吸水能力, 使作物根区土壤水分保持在最适宜作物生长的范围内。无压灌和滴灌的番茄叶绿素总量比沟灌分别提高了16.2%和12.8%; 相对沟灌, 无压灌和滴灌减小了气孔导度和蒸腾失水, 而未降低光合速率, 单叶水分利用效率分别提高51.3%和17.2%。投入、产出和效率综合评判表明, 无压灌的经济效益最好, 滴灌次之, 沟灌最差。
Key concepts: Yield (engineering), Mechanism (biology), Irrigation, Agricultural engineering, Environmental science, Horticulture, Agronomy, Computer science