1997•Journal for Research in Mathematics EducationRequires access

It Doesn't Add Up: African American Students' Mathematics Achievement

Gloria Ladson Billings

Open publisher page 316 citations

Abstract

Mathematics education has been heralded for its leadership role in the U.S. school reform effort (Stein, Grover,&Henningsen, 1996; Grant, Peterson, & Shojgreen- Downer, 1996). Prominent in the reform of mathematics education is the call for students not merely to memorize formulas and rules and apply procedures but rather to engage in the processes of mathematical thinking, that is, to do what mathematicians and other professional users of mathematics do. The revamped mathematics education program is based on engaging students in problem posing and problem solving rather than on expecting rote memorization and convergent thinking. These changes in mathematics education suggest that mathematics teaching must build on students' learning and on their ability to pose and solve problems previously considered too difficult for their age-grade levels (Carpenter&Fennema, 1988; Fennema, Franke, Carpenter,&Carey, 1993).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mathematics education has been heralded for its leadership role in the U.S. school reform effort (Stein, Grover,&Henningsen, 1996; Grant, Peterson, & Shojgreen- Downer, 1996). Prominent in the reform of mathematics education is the call for students not merely to memorize formulas and rules and apply procedures but rather to engage in the processes of mathematical thinking, that is, to do what mathematicians and other professional users of mathematics do. The revamped mathematics education program is based on engaging students in problem posing and problem solving rather than on expecting rote memorization and convergent thinking. These changes in mathematics education suggest that mathematics teaching must build on students' learning and on their ability to pose and solve problems previously considered too difficult for their age-grade levels (Carpenter&Fennema, 1988; Fennema, Franke, Carpenter,&Carey, 1993).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 316 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mathematics education has been heralded for its leadership role in the U.S. school reform effort (Stein, Grover,&Henningsen, 1996; Grant, Peterson, & Shojgreen- Downer, 1996). Prominent in the reform of mathematics education is the call for students not merely to memorize formulas and rules and apply procedures but rather to engage in the processes of mathematical thinking, that is, to do what mathematicians and other professional users of mathematics do. The revamped mathematics education program is based on engaging students in problem posing and problem solving rather than on expecting rote memorization and convergent thinking. These changes in mathematics education suggest that mathematics teaching must build on students' learning and on their ability to pose and solve problems previously considered too difficult for their age-grade levels (Carpenter&Fennema, 1988; Fennema, Franke, Carpenter,&Carey, 1993).

Key concepts: Memorization, Rote learning, Mathematics education, Reform mathematics, Connected Mathematics, Core-Plus Mathematics Project, Mathematics, Teaching method

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
It Doesn't Add Up: African American Students' Mathematics Achievement — Research Paper | ScholarLens