2003The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong)Open access

Reflections on the article 23 legislation

Jmm Chan

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The Government published its Consultation Document on the Proposals to Implement Article ’23 of the Basic Law in September 2002. In response, a unanimous voice from the community called for the publication of a White Bill, for it was said the devils were in the details. The call was rejected, as the Government argued that the Blue Bill was good enough for consultation. At the same time, the Government concluded (erroneously) that the responses to the Consultation Document showed overwhelming support for the introduction of the proposed legislation, and barged ahead.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Government published its Consultation Document on the Proposals to Implement Article ’23 of the Basic Law in September 2002. In response, a unanimous voice from the community called for the publication of a White Bill, for it was said the devils were in the details. The call was rejected, as the Government argued that the Blue Bill was good enough for consultation. At the same time, the Government concluded (erroneously) that the responses to the Consultation Document showed overwhelming support for the introduction of the proposed legislation, and barged ahead.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Government published its Consultation Document on the Proposals to Implement Article ’23 of the Basic Law in September 2002. In response, a unanimous voice from the community called for the publication of a White Bill, for it was said the devils were in the details. The call was rejected, as the Government argued that the Blue Bill was good enough for consultation. At the same time, the Government concluded (erroneously) that the responses to the Consultation Document showed overwhelming support for the introduction of the proposed legislation, and barged ahead.

Key concepts: Legislation, Government (linguistics), White paper, White (mutation), Law, Political science, Public administration, Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reflections on the article 23 legislation — Research Paper | ScholarLens