2007Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Needs-Based Approach to Social and Economic Rights

Wiktor Osiatyński

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

Social and economic rights are one of the most controversial issues in the theory and practice of rights. They are often referred to as the “rights of the second-generation” distinct from the “first-generation rights” that include civil liberties and political rights. However, the very category of social and economic rights is unclear and somewhat confused. Rights to own property and the freedom of enterprise are, in fact, basic freedoms rather than social rights: they empower an individual and limit the government's intrusion rather than suggest the government's benefits or regulation. Also a number of other social and economic rights resemble personal freedoms or political rights. It seems as if they were inserted into the category of “social and economic rights” primarily because there was no agreement on the immediate judicial enforcement of these rights. However, even when we deal with social rights in a more narrow sense, we discover that they assume a very broad range of roles for the state. Free choice of employment and protection against unemployment (UDHR art. 23(1)) imply a protective role of the state. Many social rights call for a regulatory role of the state. Very few social rights demand direct provision of goods and services by the state. Finally, some social and economic rights deal with values and directives that can at best be the goal for social policy but they are to be implemented by nonstate actors or through international measures. There is much less confusion with the other categories of rights.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Social and economic rights are one of the most controversial issues in the theory and practice of rights. They are often referred to as the “rights of the second-generation” distinct from the “first-generation rights” that include civil liberties and political rights. However, the very category of social and economic rights is unclear and somewhat confused. Rights to own property and the freedom of enterprise are, in fact, basic freedoms rather than social rights: they empower an individual and limit the government's intrusion rather than suggest the government's benefits or regulation. Also a number of other social and economic rights resemble personal freedoms or political rights. It seems as if they were inserted into the category of “social and economic rights” primarily because there was no agreement on the immediate judicial enforcement of these rights. However, even when we deal with social rights in a more narrow sense, we discover that they assume a very broad range of roles for the state. Free choice of employment and protection against unemployment (UDHR art. 23(1)) imply a protective role of the state. Many social rights call for a regulatory role of the state. Very few social rights demand direct provision of goods and services by the state. Finally, some social and economic rights deal with values and directives that can at best be the goal for social policy but they are to be implemented by nonstate actors or through international measures. There is much less confusion with the other categories of rights.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Social and economic rights are one of the most controversial issues in the theory and practice of rights. They are often referred to as the “rights of the second-generation” distinct from the “first-generation rights” that include civil liberties and political rights. However, the very category of social and economic rights is unclear and somewhat confused. Rights to own property and the freedom of enterprise are, in fact, basic freedoms rather than social rights: they empower an individual and limit the government's intrusion rather than suggest the government's benefits or regulation. Also a number of other social and economic rights resemble personal freedoms or political rights. It seems as if they were inserted into the category of “social and economic rights” primarily because there was no agreement on the immediate judicial enforcement of these rights. However, even when we deal with social rights in a more narrow sense, we discover that they assume a very broad range of roles for the state. Free choice of employment and protection against unemployment (UDHR art. 23(1)) imply a protective role of the state. Many social rights call for a regulatory role of the state. Very few social rights demand direct provision of goods and services by the state. Finally, some social and economic rights deal with values and directives that can at best be the goal for social policy but they are to be implemented by nonstate actors or through international measures. There is much less confusion with the other categories of rights.

Key concepts: Right to property, Fundamental rights, Social rights, Reservation of rights, Property rights, Political science, International human rights law, Rights of Nature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Needs-Based Approach to Social and Economic Rights — Research Paper | ScholarLens