1998•Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)Open access

In Defense of Affirmative Action

Theodore McMillian

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Affirmative action can be a remedy for specific past discrimination. This is the kind of affirmative action that is embodied in settlements or judgments. However, affirmative action can also be general. In this sense, it is used not as a remedy for specific past discrimination, but rather to promote diversity.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Affirmative action can be a remedy for specific past discrimination. This is the kind of affirmative action that is embodied in settlements or judgments. However, affirmative action can also be general. In this sense, it is used not as a remedy for specific past discrimination, but rather to promote diversity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Affirmative action can be a remedy for specific past discrimination. This is the kind of affirmative action that is embodied in settlements or judgments. However, affirmative action can also be general. In this sense, it is used not as a remedy for specific past discrimination, but rather to promote diversity.

Key concepts: Affirmative action, Action (physics), Political science, Law and economics, Law, Sociology, Physics, Quantum mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
In Defense of Affirmative Action — Research Paper | ScholarLens