2010Swiss Medical WeeklyOpen access

Recent developments in occupational asthma

Sherwood Burge

Open full text 20 citations

Abstract

Occupational exposures now account for 20% of adult onset asthma. Overall incidence has not declined, but recognition of the problem and substitutions have resulted in dramatic reductions in some causes of occupational asthma, particularly latex and glutaraldehyde in healthcare workers. Newer at risk workers include cleaners and those exposed to metal-working fluid. Standards of care have now been published, supported by evidence- based reviews of the literature, which are likely to require referral to centres specialising in occupational asthma for compliance. The spectrum of occupational asthma is expanding, with low-dose irritant mechanisms likely to account for some occupational asthma with latency. Eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic phenotypes are also seen, the non-eosinophilic variant having more normal non-specific responsiveness than the eosinophilic subgroup. Physiological confirmation of occupational asthma is required but remains challenging. Specific challenges may be negative in workers confirmed as having occupational asthma from workplace challenges. Serial measurements of peak expiratory flow or FEV1 are feasible in the occupational health and general respiratory clinic settings and provide a method of validation of occupational asthma in those without ready access to specific challenge testing, while minimum data quantity standards are now established which need to be achieved for optimal sensitivity/specificity. New developments in the analysis of serial mea-surements of peak expiratory flow comparing the mean hourly values on work and rest days have shown good specificity and sensitivity from shorter records (but more frequent readings) than needed for the standard Oasys score.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Occupational exposures now account for 20% of adult onset asthma. Overall incidence has not declined, but recognition of the problem and substitutions have resulted in dramatic reductions in some causes of occupational asthma, particularly latex and glutaraldehyde in healthcare workers. Newer at risk workers include cleaners and those exposed to metal-working fluid. Standards of care have now been published, supported by evidence- based reviews of the literature, which are likely to require referral to centres specialising in occupational asthma for compliance. The spectrum of occupational asthma is expanding, with low-dose irritant mechanisms likely to account for some occupational asthma with latency. Eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic phenotypes are also seen, the non-eosinophilic variant having more normal non-specific responsiveness than the eosinophilic subgroup. Physiological confirmation of occupational asthma is required but remains challenging. Specific challenges may be negative in workers confirmed as having occupational asthma from workplace challenges. Serial measurements of peak expiratory flow or FEV1 are feasible in the occupational health and general respiratory clinic settings and provide a method of validation of occupational asthma in those without ready access to specific challenge testing, while minimum data quantity standards are now established which need to be achieved for optimal sensitivity/specificity. New developments in the analysis of serial mea-surements of peak expiratory flow comparing the mean hourly values on work and rest days have shown good specificity and sensitivity from shorter records (but more frequent readings) than needed for the standard Oasys score.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Occupational exposures now account for 20% of adult onset asthma. Overall incidence has not declined, but recognition of the problem and substitutions have resulted in dramatic reductions in some causes of occupational asthma, particularly latex and glutaraldehyde in healthcare workers. Newer at risk workers include cleaners and those exposed to metal-working fluid. Standards of care have now been published, supported by evidence- based reviews of the literature, which are likely to require referral to centres specialising in occupational asthma for compliance. The spectrum of occupational asthma is expanding, with low-dose irritant mechanisms likely to account for some occupational asthma with latency. Eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic phenotypes are also seen, the non-eosinophilic variant having more normal non-specific responsiveness than the eosinophilic subgroup. Physiological confirmation of occupational asthma is required but remains challenging. Specific challenges may be negative in workers confirmed as having occupational asthma from workplace challenges. Serial measurements of peak expiratory flow or FEV1 are feasible in the occupational health and general respiratory clinic settings and provide a method of validation of occupational asthma in those without ready access to specific challenge testing, while minimum data quantity standards are now established which need to be achieved for optimal sensitivity/specificity. New developments in the analysis of serial mea-surements of peak expiratory flow comparing the mean hourly values on work and rest days have shown good specificity and sensitivity from shorter records (but more frequent readings) than needed for the standard Oasys score.

Key concepts: Occupational asthma, Medicine, Asthma, Occupational medicine, Referral, Occupational disease, Occupational lung disease, Occupational exposure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Recent developments in occupational asthma — Research Paper | ScholarLens