Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuations : A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis
Charles T. Carlstrom, Timothy Stephen Fuerst
Abstract
Open-access reader
Charles T. Carlstrom, Timothy Stephen Fuerst
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper develops a computable general equilibrium model in which endogenous agency costs can potentially alter business cycle dynamics.The model resembles the influential theoretical work of Bemanke and Gertler ( 1989), from whom we borrow our title.The model is calibrated to match key features of U.S. aggregate activity.Two sources of shocks are considered: shocks to the distribution of wealth and shocks to aggregate productivity.We reach two conclusions.First, "debt-deflations" can have a significant and persistent effect on real activity.In the case of large monitoring costs, a relatively small wealth redistribution (corresponding to a one-time annual surprise inflation of 1.0 percent) leads to a 0.5 percent increase in investment spending.Second, the agency-cost model naturally delivers a hump-shaped investment response to a productivity shock.This is because households delay their investment decisions until agency costs are at their lowest, a point in time several periods after the initial shock.i
OpenAlex reports 904 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper develops a computable general equilibrium model in which endogenous agency costs can potentially alter business cycle dynamics.The model resembles the influential theoretical work of Bemanke and Gertler ( 1989), from whom we borrow our title.The model is calibrated to match key features of U.S. aggregate activity.Two sources of shocks are considered: shocks to the distribution of wealth and shocks to aggregate productivity.We reach two conclusions.First, "debt-deflations" can have a significant and persistent effect on real activity.In the case of large monitoring costs, a relatively small wealth redistribution (corresponding to a one-time annual surprise inflation of 1.0 percent) leads to a 0.5 percent increase in investment spending.Second, the agency-cost model naturally delivers a hump-shaped investment response to a productivity shock.This is because households delay their investment decisions until agency costs are at their lowest, a point in time several periods after the initial shock.i
Key concepts: Computable general equilibrium, Agency (philosophy), Net (polyhedron), Agency cost, Economics, Microeconomics, Business cycle, Mathematical economics