2004•International Journal of Political EconomyRequires access

The Impact of Ecological Inequality on National Well-Being : The Case of Brazil, 1965-1998

Mariano Torras

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Opposition to growth in gross domestic product (GDP) as an indicator of economic development or social well-being improvement has been widespread since the advent of national income accounting. Some of the recent literature, motivated by growing interest in environmental issues, and sustainable development in particular, criticizes GDP from the perspective that it confuses true income and wealth consumption (Daly 1995; Repetto et al. 1989). Other critiques focus on a variety of social variables (e.g., life expectancy, literacy), designing alternative indicators that go beyond income-based definitions of social welfare (Morris 1980; UNDP 2001). Related to such efforts, Ahluwalia and Chenery (1974) take into account income inequality and disaggregate GDP to calculate well-being growth rates that, according to the authors, are more relevant than GDP growth. The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) (Daly and Cobb

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Opposition to growth in gross domestic product (GDP) as an indicator of economic development or social well-being improvement has been widespread since the advent of national income accounting. Some of the recent literature, motivated by growing interest in environmental issues, and sustainable development in particular, criticizes GDP from the perspective that it confuses true income and wealth consumption (Daly 1995; Repetto et al. 1989). Other critiques focus on a variety of social variables (e.g., life expectancy, literacy), designing alternative indicators that go beyond income-based definitions of social welfare (Morris 1980; UNDP 2001). Related to such efforts, Ahluwalia and Chenery (1974) take into account income inequality and disaggregate GDP to calculate well-being growth rates that, according to the authors, are more relevant than GDP growth. The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) (Daly and Cobb

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Opposition to growth in gross domestic product (GDP) as an indicator of economic development or social well-being improvement has been widespread since the advent of national income accounting. Some of the recent literature, motivated by growing interest in environmental issues, and sustainable development in particular, criticizes GDP from the perspective that it confuses true income and wealth consumption (Daly 1995; Repetto et al. 1989). Other critiques focus on a variety of social variables (e.g., life expectancy, literacy), designing alternative indicators that go beyond income-based definitions of social welfare (Morris 1980; UNDP 2001). Related to such efforts, Ahluwalia and Chenery (1974) take into account income inequality and disaggregate GDP to calculate well-being growth rates that, according to the authors, are more relevant than GDP growth. The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) (Daly and Cobb

Key concepts: Gross domestic product, Economics, Economic inequality, Measures of national income and output, Life expectancy, National accounts, Inequality, Human Development Index

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Impact of Ecological Inequality on National Well-Being : The Case of Brazil, 1965-1998 — Research Paper | ScholarLens