2011AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)Open access

A Comparison of Price Imputation Methods under Large Samples and Different Levels of Censoring.

Jose Antonio Lopez, Lopez, Jose Antonio

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Several imputation approaches under a large sample and different levels of censoring are compared and contrasted by using a multiple imputation methodology. The study not only discusses imputation approaches, but also quantifies differences in price variability before and after price imputation, evaluates the performance of each method, and estimates and compares parameters from a complete demand system. The study’s findings reveal that even when there is small variability among different price imputation approaches, there may be large variability among the underlying parameter estimates of interest and the ultimately desired measures. This suggests that a multiple imputation approach may be preferred over a comparison of mean prices among various imputation approaches.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several imputation approaches under a large sample and different levels of censoring are compared and contrasted by using a multiple imputation methodology. The study not only discusses imputation approaches, but also quantifies differences in price variability before and after price imputation, evaluates the performance of each method, and estimates and compares parameters from a complete demand system. The study’s findings reveal that even when there is small variability among different price imputation approaches, there may be large variability among the underlying parameter estimates of interest and the ultimately desired measures. This suggests that a multiple imputation approach may be preferred over a comparison of mean prices among various imputation approaches.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several imputation approaches under a large sample and different levels of censoring are compared and contrasted by using a multiple imputation methodology. The study not only discusses imputation approaches, but also quantifies differences in price variability before and after price imputation, evaluates the performance of each method, and estimates and compares parameters from a complete demand system. The study’s findings reveal that even when there is small variability among different price imputation approaches, there may be large variability among the underlying parameter estimates of interest and the ultimately desired measures. This suggests that a multiple imputation approach may be preferred over a comparison of mean prices among various imputation approaches.

Key concepts: Imputation (statistics), Censoring (clinical trials), Econometrics, Statistics, Computer science, Missing data, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Price Imputation Methods under Large Samples and Different Levels of Censoring. — Research Paper | ScholarLens