Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor-Relations Decisions, 1949-1988
Pablo T. Spiller, Rafael Gely
Abstract
Open-access reader
Pablo T. Spiller, Rafael Gely
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper extends the approach to Congressional and regulatory institutions developed by Shepsle and Weingast by introducing an ideologically motivated Judiciary.The model yields empirically refutable implications which are then tested in the framework of modeling the Court's industrial labor relations decisions.Using information on politicians' ADA scores, the composition of the Court, and the decisions of the Court, we obtain estimates of a) the position of the Court in relation to the relevant members of Congress, and b) the determinants of labor policy through the years.We find, first, that the Court was constrained by Congress over at least half of the period.
OpenAlex reports 299 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper extends the approach to Congressional and regulatory institutions developed by Shepsle and Weingast by introducing an ideologically motivated Judiciary.The model yields empirically refutable implications which are then tested in the framework of modeling the Court's industrial labor relations decisions.Using information on politicians' ADA scores, the composition of the Court, and the decisions of the Court, we obtain estimates of a) the position of the Court in relation to the relevant members of Congress, and b) the determinants of labor policy through the years.We find, first, that the Court was constrained by Congress over at least half of the period.
Key concepts: Supreme court, Politics, Law, Political science, Ideology, Judicial independence, Court of record, Majority opinion