2010•Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)Open access

Class-Based Affirmative Action: Creating a New Model of Diversity in Higher Education

Neil Goldsmith

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

This Note proposes that class-based affirmative action policies should be further implemented in university admissions. While the benefits of class-based policies are clear, most institutions have been hesitant to implement such initiatives for fear of subsequently reducing minority enrollment. Although class-based plans have the potential to limit minorities‘ participation in higher education, if the proper variables are taken into account by admissions offices, these plans would provide a much needed boost to both minorities and disadvantaged white applicants, creating greater socioeconomic diversity while maintaining racial diversity. Thus, this Note concludes that the implementation of class-based policies would not represent the end of race-based affirmative action. Rather, these policies would represent an important modification of race-based policies to achieve the same basic diversity goals while not sacrificing opportunities for well-qualified white students. Part I of this Note will discuss the history of both race-based affirmative action and class-based affirmative action, with a focus on the seminal case law and current public policy debate. Part II will examine the legality of class-based affirmative action policies, and explain why such policies offer a significant advantage over strictly racial policies. Finally, in Part III, this Note will identify the characteristics of an effective class-based affirmative action policy, and propose specific factors and metrics universities should consider when designing an appropriate plan.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This Note proposes that class-based affirmative action policies should be further implemented in university admissions. While the benefits of class-based policies are clear, most institutions have been hesitant to implement such initiatives for fear of subsequently reducing minority enrollment. Although class-based plans have the potential to limit minorities‘ participation in higher education, if the proper variables are taken into account by admissions offices, these plans would provide a much needed boost to both minorities and disadvantaged white applicants, creating greater socioeconomic diversity while maintaining racial diversity. Thus, this Note concludes that the implementation of class-based policies would not represent the end of race-based affirmative action. Rather, these policies would represent an important modification of race-based policies to achieve the same basic diversity goals while not sacrificing opportunities for well-qualified white students. Part I of this Note will discuss the history of both race-based affirmative action and class-based affirmative action, with a focus on the seminal case law and current public policy debate. Part II will examine the legality of class-based affirmative action policies, and explain why such policies offer a significant advantage over strictly racial policies. Finally, in Part III, this Note will identify the characteristics of an effective class-based affirmative action policy, and propose specific factors and metrics universities should consider when designing an appropriate plan.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This Note proposes that class-based affirmative action policies should be further implemented in university admissions. While the benefits of class-based policies are clear, most institutions have been hesitant to implement such initiatives for fear of subsequently reducing minority enrollment. Although class-based plans have the potential to limit minorities‘ participation in higher education, if the proper variables are taken into account by admissions offices, these plans would provide a much needed boost to both minorities and disadvantaged white applicants, creating greater socioeconomic diversity while maintaining racial diversity. Thus, this Note concludes that the implementation of class-based policies would not represent the end of race-based affirmative action. Rather, these policies would represent an important modification of race-based policies to achieve the same basic diversity goals while not sacrificing opportunities for well-qualified white students. Part I of this Note will discuss the history of both race-based affirmative action and class-based affirmative action, with a focus on the seminal case law and current public policy debate. Part II will examine the legality of class-based affirmative action policies, and explain why such policies offer a significant advantage over strictly racial policies. Finally, in Part III, this Note will identify the characteristics of an effective class-based affirmative action policy, and propose specific factors and metrics universities should consider when designing an appropriate plan.

Key concepts: Affirmative action, Diversity (politics), Class (philosophy), Class action, Race (biology), Higher education, Action (physics), Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Class-Based Affirmative Action: Creating a New Model of Diversity in Higher Education — Research Paper | ScholarLens