2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Global Comparison of Microwave and Optical Cloud Liquid Water Path Retrievals

Seethala Chellappan, Ákos Horváth

0 citations

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed one year of spatially and temporally matched microwave and optical cloud liquid water path (CLWP) estimates from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for Earth Observing System (AMSRE) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instruments. Specifically, microwave CLWPs were produced by the Wentz algorithm, while optical CLWPs were parameterized from MODIS cloud optical thickness and droplet effective radius. We considered both the operational MODIS estimates assuming vertically homogeneous clouds and an adiabatic cloud model, which reduces operational values by approximately 17%. We then systematically investigated differences between AMSR-E and MODIS CLWP retrievals in warm oceanic clouds as a function of a variety of factors such as cloud fraction, geographic location, effective radius profile, cloud temperature, and rain rate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, we analyzed one year of spatially and temporally matched microwave and optical cloud liquid water path (CLWP) estimates from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for Earth Observing System (AMSRE) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instruments. Specifically, microwave CLWPs were produced by the Wentz algorithm, while optical CLWPs were parameterized from MODIS cloud optical thickness and droplet effective radius. We considered both the operational MODIS estimates assuming vertically homogeneous clouds and an adiabatic cloud model, which reduces operational values by approximately 17%. We then systematically investigated differences between AMSR-E and MODIS CLWP retrievals in warm oceanic clouds as a function of a variety of factors such as cloud fraction, geographic location, effective radius profile, cloud temperature, and rain rate.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, we analyzed one year of spatially and temporally matched microwave and optical cloud liquid water path (CLWP) estimates from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for Earth Observing System (AMSRE) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instruments. Specifically, microwave CLWPs were produced by the Wentz algorithm, while optical CLWPs were parameterized from MODIS cloud optical thickness and droplet effective radius. We considered both the operational MODIS estimates assuming vertically homogeneous clouds and an adiabatic cloud model, which reduces operational values by approximately 17%. We then systematically investigated differences between AMSR-E and MODIS CLWP retrievals in warm oceanic clouds as a function of a variety of factors such as cloud fraction, geographic location, effective radius profile, cloud temperature, and rain rate.

Key concepts: Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer, Liquid water path, Effective radius, Environmental science, Remote sensing, Cloud fraction, Microwave, Cloud computing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source link unavailable
Global Comparison of Microwave and Optical Cloud Liquid Water Path Retrievals — Research Paper | ScholarLens